7-94398387-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000089.4(COL1A2):​c.87T>C​(p.Thr29Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0398 in 941,242 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4,186 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.12 ( 2768 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.024 ( 1418 hom. )

Consequence

COL1A2
NM_000089.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.88

Publications

16 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
COL1A2 (HGNC:2198): (collagen type I alpha 2 chain) This gene encodes the pro-alpha2 chain of type I collagen whose triple helix comprises two alpha1 chains and one alpha2 chain. Type I is a fibril-forming collagen found in most connective tissues and is abundant in bone, cornea, dermis and tendon. Mutations in this gene are associated with osteogenesis imperfecta types I-IV, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type VIIB, recessive Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Classical type, idiopathic osteoporosis, and atypical Marfan syndrome. Symptoms associated with mutations in this gene, however, tend to be less severe than mutations in the gene for the alpha1 chain of type I collagen (COL1A1) reflecting the different role of alpha2 chains in matrix integrity. Three transcripts, resulting from the use of alternate polyadenylation signals, have been identified for this gene. [provided by R. Dalgleish, Feb 2008]
COL1A2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, arthrochalasia type, 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Illumina, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • osteogenesis imperfecta
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
  • osteogenesis imperfecta type 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
  • osteogenesis imperfecta type 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, G2P, ClinGen
  • osteogenesis imperfecta type 3
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, ClinGen
  • osteogenesis imperfecta type 4
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
  • Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, arthrochalasia type
    Inheritance: AR, AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, ClinGen
  • Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, cardiac valvular type
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, ClinGen, PanelApp Australia, Orphanet, G2P
  • combined osteogenesis imperfecta and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen, Ambry Genetics
  • Ehlers-Danlos/osteogenesis imperfecta syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • high bone mass osteogenesis imperfecta
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.69).
BP6
Variant 7-94398387-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-94398387-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 196205.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.88 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.348 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
COL1A2NM_000089.4 linkc.87T>C p.Thr29Thr synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 52 ENST00000297268.11 NP_000080.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
COL1A2ENST00000297268.11 linkc.87T>C p.Thr29Thr synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 52 1 NM_000089.4 ENSP00000297268.6

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.121
AC:
18400
AN:
151776
Hom.:
2762
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.331
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0764
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0141
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.362
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0710
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0315
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0362
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0107
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.102
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0590
AC:
10069
AN:
170612
AF XY:
0.0527
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.316
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0550
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0135
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.322
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0296
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00948
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0385
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0240
AC:
18983
AN:
789352
Hom.:
1418
Cov.:
11
AF XY:
0.0243
AC XY:
9837
AN XY:
404674
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.259
AC:
3886
AN:
14976
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0517
AC:
1485
AN:
28700
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0116
AC:
213
AN:
18290
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.229
AC:
4797
AN:
20936
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0471
AC:
2610
AN:
55470
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0242
AC:
881
AN:
36336
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0217
AC:
87
AN:
4014
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00651
AC:
3752
AN:
576478
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0372
AC:
1272
AN:
34152
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.425
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
552
1104
1656
2208
2760
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
248
496
744
992
1240
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.121
AC:
18451
AN:
151890
Hom.:
2768
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.122
AC XY:
9087
AN XY:
74242
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.331
AC:
13729
AN:
41440
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0763
AC:
1165
AN:
15276
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0141
AC:
49
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.362
AC:
1871
AN:
5168
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0704
AC:
339
AN:
4816
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0315
AC:
332
AN:
10556
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0390
AC:
11
AN:
282
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0107
AC:
729
AN:
67862
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.107
AC:
226
AN:
2106
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.499
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
668
1336
2003
2671
3339
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
174
348
522
696
870
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0372
Hom.:
1735
Bravo
AF:
0.136
Asia WGS
AF:
0.242
AC:
828
AN:
3414

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Jun 01, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Nov 17, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 27, 2012
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Osteogenesis imperfecta Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, arthrochalasia type, 2 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided Benign:1
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Osteogenesis imperfecta type I;C0268335:Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type, 1 Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Jan 04, 2019
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.69
CADD
Benign
13
DANN
Benign
0.77
PhyloP100
1.9
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.070
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1801182; hg19: chr7-94027699; API