7-94409720-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_000089.4(COL1A2):​c.937-3C>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.771 in 1,613,902 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 483,060 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.81 ( 49961 hom., cov: 30)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.77 ( 433099 hom. )

Consequence

COL1A2
NM_000089.4 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.0002244
2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:19

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.249

Publications

28 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
COL1A2 (HGNC:2198): (collagen type I alpha 2 chain) This gene encodes the pro-alpha2 chain of type I collagen whose triple helix comprises two alpha1 chains and one alpha2 chain. Type I is a fibril-forming collagen found in most connective tissues and is abundant in bone, cornea, dermis and tendon. Mutations in this gene are associated with osteogenesis imperfecta types I-IV, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type VIIB, recessive Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Classical type, idiopathic osteoporosis, and atypical Marfan syndrome. Symptoms associated with mutations in this gene, however, tend to be less severe than mutations in the gene for the alpha1 chain of type I collagen (COL1A1) reflecting the different role of alpha2 chains in matrix integrity. Three transcripts, resulting from the use of alternate polyadenylation signals, have been identified for this gene. [provided by R. Dalgleish, Feb 2008]
COL1A2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, arthrochalasia type, 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Illumina, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • osteogenesis imperfecta
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
  • osteogenesis imperfecta type 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
  • osteogenesis imperfecta type 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, G2P, ClinGen
  • osteogenesis imperfecta type 3
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, ClinGen
  • osteogenesis imperfecta type 4
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
  • Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, arthrochalasia type
    Inheritance: AR, AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, ClinGen
  • Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, cardiac valvular type
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, ClinGen, PanelApp Australia, Orphanet, G2P
  • combined osteogenesis imperfecta and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen, Ambry Genetics
  • Ehlers-Danlos/osteogenesis imperfecta syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • high bone mass osteogenesis imperfecta
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.66).
BP6
Variant 7-94409720-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-94409720-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 254958.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.892 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
COL1A2NM_000089.4 linkc.937-3C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 18 of 51 ENST00000297268.11 NP_000080.2 P08123A0A0S2Z3H5

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
COL1A2ENST00000297268.11 linkc.937-3C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 18 of 51 1 NM_000089.4 ENSP00000297268.6 P08123

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.807
AC:
122632
AN:
151974
Hom.:
49911
Cov.:
30
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.899
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.716
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.799
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.667
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.914
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.662
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.785
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.665
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.768
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.764
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.776
AC:
195084
AN:
251468
AF XY:
0.763
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.903
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.820
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.676
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.909
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.789
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.764
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.739
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.768
AC:
1122367
AN:
1461810
Hom.:
433099
Cov.:
57
AF XY:
0.763
AC XY:
554824
AN XY:
727210
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.896
AC:
30009
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.817
AC:
36558
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.672
AC:
17567
AN:
26134
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.938
AC:
37253
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.649
AC:
56012
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.785
AC:
41927
AN:
53418
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.621
AC:
3579
AN:
5764
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.768
AC:
853770
AN:
1111940
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.757
AC:
45692
AN:
60396
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.488
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
15982
31963
47945
63926
79908
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20474
40948
61422
81896
102370
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.807
AC:
122741
AN:
152092
Hom.:
49961
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.804
AC XY:
59814
AN XY:
74352
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.899
AC:
37325
AN:
41502
American (AMR)
AF:
0.799
AC:
12206
AN:
15284
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.667
AC:
2316
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.914
AC:
4706
AN:
5148
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.662
AC:
3187
AN:
4814
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.785
AC:
8300
AN:
10578
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.673
AC:
198
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.768
AC:
52231
AN:
67972
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.765
AC:
1619
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1153
2306
3460
4613
5766
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
868
1736
2604
3472
4340
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.781
Hom.:
26766
Bravo
AF:
0.816
Asia WGS
AF:
0.799
AC:
2779
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.752
EpiControl
AF:
0.754

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:19
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:7
-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 03, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

May 04, 2012
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 09, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Osteogenesis imperfecta Benign:2
Jul 18, 2022
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, arthrochalasia type, 2 Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jul 22, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
Nov 27, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Osteogenesis imperfecta type III Benign:1
Jul 22, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Benign:1
Jul 16, 2022
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Osteogenesis imperfecta with normal sclerae, dominant form Benign:1
Jul 22, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Osteogenesis imperfecta, perinatal lethal Benign:1
Jul 22, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Osteogenesis imperfecta type I;C0268335:Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type, 1 Benign:1
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Dec 04, 2018
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.66
CADD
Benign
7.4
DANN
Benign
0.73
PhyloP100
0.25
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.00022
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs42519; hg19: chr7-94039032; API