7-94409734-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000089.4(COL1A2):​c.948C>T​(p.Gly316Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00837 in 1,614,104 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 69 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0057 ( 5 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0086 ( 64 hom. )

Consequence

COL1A2
NM_000089.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.257

Publications

8 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
COL1A2 (HGNC:2198): (collagen type I alpha 2 chain) This gene encodes the pro-alpha2 chain of type I collagen whose triple helix comprises two alpha1 chains and one alpha2 chain. Type I is a fibril-forming collagen found in most connective tissues and is abundant in bone, cornea, dermis and tendon. Mutations in this gene are associated with osteogenesis imperfecta types I-IV, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type VIIB, recessive Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Classical type, idiopathic osteoporosis, and atypical Marfan syndrome. Symptoms associated with mutations in this gene, however, tend to be less severe than mutations in the gene for the alpha1 chain of type I collagen (COL1A1) reflecting the different role of alpha2 chains in matrix integrity. Three transcripts, resulting from the use of alternate polyadenylation signals, have been identified for this gene. [provided by R. Dalgleish, Feb 2008]
COL1A2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, arthrochalasia type, 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Illumina, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • osteogenesis imperfecta
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
  • osteogenesis imperfecta type 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
  • osteogenesis imperfecta type 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, G2P, ClinGen
  • osteogenesis imperfecta type 3
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, ClinGen
  • osteogenesis imperfecta type 4
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
  • Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, arthrochalasia type
    Inheritance: AR, AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, ClinGen
  • Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, cardiac valvular type
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, ClinGen, PanelApp Australia, Orphanet, G2P
  • combined osteogenesis imperfecta and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen, Ambry Genetics
  • Ehlers-Danlos/osteogenesis imperfecta syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • high bone mass osteogenesis imperfecta
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.42).
BP6
Variant 7-94409734-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-94409734-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 35960.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.257 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00573 (872/152256) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00863 (587/68012). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00805. There are 5 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 447 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 5 AD,AR gene

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000089.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
COL1A2
NM_000089.4
MANE Select
c.948C>Tp.Gly316Gly
synonymous
Exon 19 of 52NP_000080.2

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
COL1A2
ENST00000297268.11
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.948C>Tp.Gly316Gly
synonymous
Exon 19 of 52ENSP00000297268.6

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00573
AC:
871
AN:
152138
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00138
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00220
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00366
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0159
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00621
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00622
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0127
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00863
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00669
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00779
AC:
1958
AN:
251432
AF XY:
0.00845
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00160
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00379
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0153
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00513
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0101
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00993
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00865
AC:
12644
AN:
1461848
Hom.:
64
Cov.:
37
AF XY:
0.00880
AC XY:
6397
AN XY:
727228
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00155
AC:
52
AN:
33478
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00432
AC:
193
AN:
44720
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0160
AC:
419
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0107
AC:
925
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00481
AC:
257
AN:
53420
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0156
AC:
90
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00915
AC:
10170
AN:
1111978
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00891
AC:
538
AN:
60396
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.465
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
764
1527
2291
3054
3818
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
388
776
1164
1552
1940
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00573
AC:
872
AN:
152256
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00600
AC XY:
447
AN XY:
74440
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00140
AC:
58
AN:
41550
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00366
AC:
56
AN:
15304
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0159
AC:
55
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5166
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00622
AC:
30
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00622
AC:
66
AN:
10610
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0137
AC:
4
AN:
292
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00863
AC:
587
AN:
68012
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00662
AC:
14
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.498
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
47
93
140
186
233
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00742
Hom.:
4
Bravo
AF:
0.00555
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00173
AC:
6
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0104
EpiControl
AF:
0.00948

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Jan 24, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Dec 06, 2024
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Aug 05, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided Benign:3
Nov 13, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Sep 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

COL1A2: BP4, BP7, BS1, BS2

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Osteogenesis imperfecta Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Aug 20, 2021
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Benign:1
Jul 07, 2022
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, arthrochalasia type, 2 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Osteogenesis imperfecta type I;C0268335:Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type, 1 Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Dec 24, 2018
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.42
CADD
Benign
5.7
DANN
Benign
0.65
PhyloP100
0.26
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
Splicevardb
2.0
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs34511999; hg19: chr7-94039046; API