7-94429325-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000089.4(COL1A2):ā€‹c.3849T>Cā€‹(p.Thr1283=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000652 in 1,614,156 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.0033 ( 3 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes š‘“: 0.00037 ( 5 hom. )

Consequence

COL1A2
NM_000089.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.626
Variant links:
Genes affected
COL1A2 (HGNC:2198): (collagen type I alpha 2 chain) This gene encodes the pro-alpha2 chain of type I collagen whose triple helix comprises two alpha1 chains and one alpha2 chain. Type I is a fibril-forming collagen found in most connective tissues and is abundant in bone, cornea, dermis and tendon. Mutations in this gene are associated with osteogenesis imperfecta types I-IV, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type VIIB, recessive Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Classical type, idiopathic osteoporosis, and atypical Marfan syndrome. Symptoms associated with mutations in this gene, however, tend to be less severe than mutations in the gene for the alpha1 chain of type I collagen (COL1A1) reflecting the different role of alpha2 chains in matrix integrity. Three transcripts, resulting from the use of alternate polyadenylation signals, have been identified for this gene. [provided by R. Dalgleish, Feb 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.63).
BP6
Variant 7-94429325-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-94429325-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 360974.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.626 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00334 (508/152308) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0112 (466/41568). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0104. There are 3 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 222 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 3 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
COL1A2NM_000089.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.3849T>C p.Thr1283= synonymous_variant 51/52 ENST00000297268.11

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
COL1A2ENST00000297268.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.3849T>C p.Thr1283= synonymous_variant 51/521 NM_000089.4 P1
COL1A2ENST00000464916.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.897T>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 3/42
COL1A2ENST00000481570.5 linkuse as main transcriptn.4630T>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 8/82

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00333
AC:
507
AN:
152190
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0112
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00183
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000103
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00239
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000892
AC:
224
AN:
251056
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000619
AC XY:
84
AN XY:
135672
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0124
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000260
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000653
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000617
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000817
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000373
AC:
545
AN:
1461848
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000341
AC XY:
248
AN XY:
727222
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0122
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000447
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000348
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000351
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00101
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00334
AC:
508
AN:
152308
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00298
AC XY:
222
AN XY:
74482
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0112
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00183
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000103
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00236
Alfa
AF:
0.00151
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00368
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00144
AC:
5
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenMay 01, 2023COL1A2: BP4, BP7, BS1, BS2 -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesJan 16, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Osteogenesis imperfecta Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick ChildrenDec 01, 2019- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxFeb 12, 2018This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Ehlers-danlos syndrome, arthrochalasia type, 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Osteogenesis imperfecta type I;C0268335:Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type, 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 18, 2024- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJul 19, 2019This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.63
CADD
Benign
3.1
DANN
Benign
0.72

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs34038163; hg19: chr7-94058637; API