8-133242079-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_006096.4(NDRG1):​c.892-5C>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00247 in 1,614,188 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 75 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.012 ( 40 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0015 ( 35 hom. )

Consequence

NDRG1
NM_006096.4 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00001699
2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.956

Publications

1 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
NDRG1 (HGNC:7679): (N-myc downstream regulated 1) This gene is a member of the N-myc downregulated gene family which belongs to the alpha/beta hydrolase superfamily. The protein encoded by this gene is a cytoplasmic protein involved in stress responses, hormone responses, cell growth, and differentiation. The encoded protein is necessary for p53-mediated caspase activation and apoptosis. Mutations in this gene are a cause of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4D, and expression of this gene may be a prognostic indicator for several types of cancer. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding multiple isoforms have been observed for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, May 2012]
NDRG1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4D
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Illumina

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.72).
BP6
Variant 8-133242079-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-133242079-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 362033.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.012 (1829/152320) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0403 (1673/41562). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0386. There are 40 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 855 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 40 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
NDRG1NM_006096.4 linkc.892-5C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 14 of 15 ENST00000323851.13 NP_006087.2 Q92597-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
NDRG1ENST00000323851.13 linkc.892-5C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 14 of 15 1 NM_006096.4 ENSP00000319977.8 Q92597-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0120
AC:
1821
AN:
152202
Hom.:
40
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0402
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00451
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0124
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000577
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000250
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0105
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00338
AC:
851
AN:
251458
AF XY:
0.00253
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0403
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00191
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00804
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000272
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000264
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00130
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00148
AC:
2166
AN:
1461868
Hom.:
35
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00131
AC XY:
950
AN XY:
727242
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0419
AC:
1403
AN:
33478
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00201
AC:
90
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00941
AC:
246
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000151
AC:
6
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000139
AC:
12
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53414
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00243
AC:
14
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000171
AC:
190
AN:
1111994
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00339
AC:
205
AN:
60396
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.459
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
117
235
352
470
587
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
52
104
156
208
260
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0120
AC:
1829
AN:
152320
Hom.:
40
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0115
AC XY:
855
AN XY:
74482
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0403
AC:
1673
AN:
41562
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00451
AC:
69
AN:
15310
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0124
AC:
43
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000578
AC:
3
AN:
5186
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000207
AC:
1
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10614
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00340
AC:
1
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000250
AC:
17
AN:
68034
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0104
AC:
22
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.505
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
90
180
269
359
449
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00719
Hom.:
14
Bravo
AF:
0.0136
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00346
AC:
13
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.000356

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:2
Dec 12, 2017
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4D Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Nov 23, 2019
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:1
Oct 27, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1
-
Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4 Benign:1
Jan 29, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.72
CADD
Benign
1.1
DANN
Benign
0.61
PhyloP100
0.96
Mutation Taster
=98/2
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.000017
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2233346; hg19: chr8-134254322; API