8-142664551-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_003724.4(JRK):c.1508G>A(p.Arg503Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00778 in 1,607,948 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 69 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 9/13 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003724.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JRK | ENST00000612905.2 | c.1508G>A | p.Arg503Gln | missense_variant | 2/2 | 2 | NM_003724.4 | ENSP00000482410.1 | ||
JRK | ENST00000614134.1 | c.1508G>A | p.Arg503Gln | missense_variant | 2/2 | 1 | ENSP00000485390.1 | |||
JRK | ENST00000571961.7 | c.1508G>A | p.Arg503Gln | missense_variant | 2/3 | 1 | ENSP00000461610.1 | |||
JRK | ENST00000615982.4 | c.1508G>A | p.Arg503Gln | missense_variant | 2/4 | 1 | ENSP00000483808.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00532 AC: 810AN: 152194Hom.: 5 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00573 AC: 1329AN: 231884Hom.: 10 AF XY: 0.00575 AC XY: 733AN XY: 127400
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00804 AC: 11701AN: 1455636Hom.: 64 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.00775 AC XY: 5611AN XY: 723892
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00532 AC: 810AN: 152312Hom.: 5 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00473 AC XY: 352AN XY: 74470
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Oct 01, 2024 | JRK: BP4, BS2 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 31, 2019 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at