8-142875819-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_000497.4(CYP11B1):​c.1014G>A​(p.Gln338Gln) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00157 in 1,614,108 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0015 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0016 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

CYP11B1
NM_000497.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.107

Publications

0 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CYP11B1 (HGNC:2591): (cytochrome P450 family 11 subfamily B member 1) This gene encodes a member of the cytochrome P450 superfamily of enzymes. The cytochrome P450 proteins are monooxygenases which catalyze many reactions involved in drug metabolism and synthesis of cholesterol, steroids and other lipids. This protein localizes to the mitochondrial inner membrane and is involved in the conversion of progesterone to cortisol in the adrenal cortex. Mutations in this gene cause congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to 11-beta-hydroxylase deficiency. Transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been noted for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
GML (HGNC:4375): (glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchored molecule like) Predicted to be involved in DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediator resulting in cell cycle arrest; apoptotic process; and negative regulation of cell population proliferation. Predicted to be extrinsic component of membrane. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.42).
BP6
Variant 8-142875819-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-142875819-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 362154.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.107 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00151 (230/152266) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00238 (162/67992). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00208. There are 2 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 98 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CYP11B1NM_000497.4 linkc.1014G>A p.Gln338Gln synonymous_variant Exon 6 of 9 ENST00000292427.10 NP_000488.3 P15538-1Q8TDD0
CYP11B1NM_001026213.1 linkc.1014G>A p.Gln338Gln synonymous_variant Exon 6 of 8 NP_001021384.1 P15538-2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CYP11B1ENST00000292427.10 linkc.1014G>A p.Gln338Gln synonymous_variant Exon 6 of 9 1 NM_000497.4 ENSP00000292427.5 P15538-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00151
AC:
230
AN:
152148
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000579
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0406
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000941
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00238
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00144
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00122
AC:
307
AN:
251092
AF XY:
0.00108
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000370
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000145
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000416
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00248
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000978
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00158
AC:
2308
AN:
1461842
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00151
AC XY:
1096
AN XY:
727234
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000209
AC:
7
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000157
AC:
7
AN:
44720
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0000383
AC:
1
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000756
AC:
3
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000431
AC:
23
AN:
53382
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00198
AC:
2207
AN:
1112004
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000993
AC:
60
AN:
60396
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.487
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
145
291
436
582
727
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
86
172
258
344
430
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00151
AC:
230
AN:
152266
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00132
AC XY:
98
AN XY:
74462
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000577
AC:
24
AN:
41572
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000196
AC:
3
AN:
15298
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5166
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000941
AC:
1
AN:
10626
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00238
AC:
162
AN:
67992
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00142
AC:
3
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
14
28
43
57
71
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00203
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00134
EpiCase
AF:
0.00169
EpiControl
AF:
0.00119

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 19, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Deficiency of steroid 11-beta-monooxygenase Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not specified Benign:1
Jan 12, 2017
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Glucocorticoid-remediable aldosteronism Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.42
CADD
Benign
5.8
DANN
Benign
0.84
PhyloP100
0.11
PromoterAI
-0.083
Neutral

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs151335623; hg19: chr8-143957235; COSMIC: COSV52829549; COSMIC: COSV52829549; API