8-143916573-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_201384.3(PLEC):c.13248G>A(p.Thr4416Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000814 in 1,611,542 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 11 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_201384.3 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- epidermolysis bullosa simplexInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: G2P
- epidermolysis bullosa simplex 5A, Ogna typeInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, PanelApp Australia, Genomics England PanelApp
- autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2QInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- congenital myasthenic syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- epidermolysis bullosa simplex 5B, with muscular dystrophyInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp
- epidermolysis bullosa simplex 5C, with pyloric atresiaInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp
- epidermolysis bullosa simplex with nail dystrophyInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia
- autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophyInheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen
- aplasia cutis congenitaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- cholestasisInheritance: AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLEC | ENST00000345136.8 | c.13248G>A | p.Thr4416Thr | synonymous_variant | Exon 32 of 32 | 1 | NM_201384.3 | ENSP00000344848.3 | ||
| PLEC | ENST00000356346.7 | c.13206G>A | p.Thr4402Thr | synonymous_variant | Exon 32 of 32 | 1 | NM_201378.4 | ENSP00000348702.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00424 AC: 645AN: 152186Hom.: 6 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00123 AC: 295AN: 239838 AF XY: 0.000919 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000454 AC: 662AN: 1459238Hom.: 4 Cov.: 44 AF XY: 0.000387 AC XY: 281AN XY: 725968 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00426 AC: 649AN: 152304Hom.: 7 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00420 AC XY: 313AN XY: 74480 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Thr4553Thr in exon 32 of PLEC: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located wit hin the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 1.4% (56/3946) of A frican American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencin g Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs115621402). -
not provided Benign:2
- -
- -
Epidermolysis bullosa simplex, Ogna type;C2677349:Epidermolysis bullosa simplex 5C, with pyloric atresia;C2931072:Epidermolysis bullosa simplex 5B, with muscular dystrophy;C3150989:Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2Q;C4225309:Epidermolysis bullosa simplex with nail dystrophy Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at