8-22046256-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points: 2P and 0B. PM2
The NM_003867.4(FGF17):c.215G>C(p.Arg72Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,461,408 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R72H) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003867.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- hypogonadotropic hypogonadism 20 with or without anosmiaInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- hypogonadotropic hypogonadismInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Kallmann syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_003867.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FGF17 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.215G>C | p.Arg72Pro | missense | Exon 3 of 5 | ENSP00000352414.3 | O60258-1 | ||
| FGF17 | TSL:1 | c.182G>C | p.Arg61Pro | missense | Exon 3 of 5 | ENSP00000431041.1 | O60258-2 | ||
| FGF17 | TSL:3 | n.560G>C | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 2 of 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461408Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 727004 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at