8-27461689-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS2
The NM_000742.4(CHRNA2):c.1530C>T(p.Ile510=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000639 in 1,614,232 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00047 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00066 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
CHRNA2
NM_000742.4 synonymous
NM_000742.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.766
Genes affected
CHRNA2 (HGNC:1956): (cholinergic receptor nicotinic alpha 2 subunit) Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) are ligand-gated ion channels formed by a pentameric arrangement of alpha and beta subunits to create distinct muscle and neuronal receptors. Neuronal receptors are found throughout the peripheral and central nervous system where they are involved in fast synaptic transmission. This gene encodes an alpha subunit that is widely expressed in the brain. The proposed structure for nAChR subunits is a conserved N-terminal extracellular domain followed by three conserved transmembrane domains, a variable cytoplasmic loop, a fourth conserved transmembrane domain, and a short C-terminal extracellular region. Mutations in this gene cause autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy type 4. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in this gene have been associated with nicotine dependence. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2009]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.38).
BP6
Variant 8-27461689-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-27461689-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 362693.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1, Likely_benign=2}. Variant chr8-27461689-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.766 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 71 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHRNA2 | NM_000742.4 | c.1530C>T | p.Ile510= | synonymous_variant | 7/7 | ENST00000407991.3 | NP_000733.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHRNA2 | ENST00000407991.3 | c.1530C>T | p.Ile510= | synonymous_variant | 7/7 | 5 | NM_000742.4 | ENSP00000385026 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000466 AC: 71AN: 152234Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
71
AN:
152234
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000414 AC: 104AN: 251474Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000419 AC XY: 57AN XY: 135920
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
104
AN:
251474
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
57
AN XY:
135920
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000657 AC: 960AN: 1461880Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000616 AC XY: 448AN XY: 727238
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
960
AN:
1461880
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
448
AN XY:
727238
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000466 AC: 71AN: 152352Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000349 AC XY: 26AN XY: 74502
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
71
AN:
152352
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
26
AN XY:
74502
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | May 18, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 12, 2018 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Apr 11, 2017 | - - |
Autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 17, 2024 | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Apr 08, 2017 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy 4 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at