8-27774556-T-G
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS1BS2
The NM_001017420.3(ESCO2):c.-68T>G variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00977 in 152,276 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 25 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0098 ( 25 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0 ( 0 hom. )
Failed GnomAD Quality Control
Consequence
ESCO2
NM_001017420.3 5_prime_UTR
NM_001017420.3 5_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.0890
Genes affected
ESCO2 (HGNC:27230): (establishment of sister chromatid cohesion N-acetyltransferase 2) This gene encodes a protein that may have acetyltransferase activity and may be required for the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion during the S phase of mitosis. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Roberts syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.86).
BP6
Variant 8-27774556-T-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-27774556-T-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 362726.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00977 (1487/152276) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0336 (1395/41550). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0321. There are 25 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 678 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 25 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESCO2 | NM_001017420.3 | c.-68T>G | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/11 | ENST00000305188.13 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESCO2 | ENST00000305188.13 | c.-68T>G | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/11 | 1 | NM_001017420.3 | P1 | ||
ESCO2 | ENST00000522378.5 | c.-68T>G | 5_prime_UTR_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 1/12 | 1 | ||||
ESCO2 | ENST00000523566.5 | c.-16-943T>G | intron_variant | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00973 AC: 1481AN: 152158Hom.: 25 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
1481
AN:
152158
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0 AF: 0.00 AC: 0AN: 60Hom.: 0 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 40
GnomAD4 exome
Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
60
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
40
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00977 AC: 1487AN: 152276Hom.: 25 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00911 AC XY: 678AN XY: 74464
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
1487
AN:
152276
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
678
AN XY:
74464
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
16
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Roberts-SC phocomelia syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at