8-31141764-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 2P and 6B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6_Moderate
The NM_000553.6(WRN):āc.3222G>Cā(p.Leu1074Phe) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000342 in 1,461,544 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Benignin Lovd.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000553.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WRN | NM_000553.6 | c.3222G>C | p.Leu1074Phe | missense_variant | 26/35 | ENST00000298139.7 | NP_000544.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WRN | ENST00000298139.7 | c.3222G>C | p.Leu1074Phe | missense_variant | 26/35 | 1 | NM_000553.6 | ENSP00000298139.5 | ||
WRN | ENST00000521620.5 | n.1855G>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 14/23 | 1 | |||||
WRN | ENST00000650667.1 | n.*2836G>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 25/34 | ENSP00000498593.1 | |||||
WRN | ENST00000650667.1 | n.*2836G>C | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 25/34 | ENSP00000498593.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000342 AC: 5AN: 1461544Hom.: 0 Cov.: 44 AF XY: 0.00000550 AC XY: 4AN XY: 727108
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 31
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Werner syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Mar 29, 2020 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at