Genetic Variant CHRNB3:p.Ser403Ser (chr8-42732516-G-A) – ACMG Classification: Likely_benign (-5 pts)

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP7

The NM_000749.5(CHRNB3):c.1209G>A(p.Ser403Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000168 in 1,604,318 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. S403S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000018 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CHRNB3
NM_000749.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Not reported in ClinVar

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.21

Publications

24 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

CHRNB3 (HGNC:1963): (cholinergic receptor nicotinic beta 3 subunit) The nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) are members of a superfamily of ligand-gated ion channels that mediate fast signal transmission at synapses. The nAChRs are (hetero)pentamers composed of homologous subunits. The subunits that make up the muscle and neuronal forms of nAChRs are encoded by separate genes and have different primary structure. There are several subtypes of neuronal nAChRs that vary based on which homologous subunits are arranged around the central channel. They are classified as alpha-subunits if, like muscle alpha-1 (MIM 100690), they have a pair of adjacent cysteines as part of the presumed acetylcholine binding site. Subunits lacking these cysteine residues are classified as beta-subunits (Groot Kormelink and Luyten, 1997 [PubMed 9009220]). Elliott et al. (1996) [PubMed 8906617] stated that the proposed structure for each subunit is a conserved N-terminal extracellular domain followed by 3 conserved transmembrane domains, a variable cytoplasmic loop, a fourth conserved transmembrane domain, and a short C-terminal extracellular region.[supplied by OMIM, Apr 2010]

CHRNB3 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.86).

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.21 with no splicing effect.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000749.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Sel.	Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
	CHRNB3	NM_000749.5	MANE Select	c.1209G>A	p.Ser403Ser	synonymous	Exon 5 of 6	NP_000740.1	Q05901
	CHRNB3	NM_001347717.2		c.987G>A	p.Ser329Ser	synonymous	Exon 6 of 7	NP_001334646.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Sel.	Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
	CHRNB3	ENST00000289957.3	TSL:1 MANE Select	c.1209G>A	p.Ser403Ser	synonymous	Exon 5 of 6	ENSP00000289957.2	Q05901

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00000658

AC:

AN:

152070

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000417

AC:

AN:

239538

AF XY:

0.0000616

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000184

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000340

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000179

AC:

AN:

1452248

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000235

AC XY:

AN XY:

722096

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

32812

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

42042

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

25714

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39664

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000203

AC:

AN:

83892

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53208

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000526

AC:

AN:

5702

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000451

AC:

AN:

1109186

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000167

AC:

AN:

60028

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.502

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00000658

AC:

AN:

152070

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00

AC XY:

AN XY:

74276

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41392

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15254

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3466

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5198

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4826

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10588

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000147

AC:

AN:

68030

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2092

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.475

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Alfa

AF:

0.0000712

Hom.:

ClinVar

Not reported in ClinVar

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.86

CADD

Benign

1.0

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.38

PhyloP100

-1.2

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over