8-42837806-T-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBS1_SupportingBS2
The NM_018105.3(THAP1):c.*156A>G variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000102 in 687,664 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000059 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00011 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
THAP1
NM_018105.3 3_prime_UTR
NM_018105.3 3_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.359
Genes affected
THAP1 (HGNC:20856): (THAP domain containing 1) The protein encoded by this gene contains a THAP domain, a conserved DNA-binding domain. This protein colocalizes with the apoptosis response protein PAWR/PAR-4 in promyelocytic leukemia (PML) nuclear bodies, and functions as a proapoptotic factor that links PAWR to PML nuclear bodies. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding distinct isoforms have been observed. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.84).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000114 (61/535582) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000133 (56/422284). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000105. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 31 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 7. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 9 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
THAP1 | NM_018105.3 | c.*156A>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 3/3 | ENST00000254250.7 | NP_060575.1 | ||
THAP1 | NM_199003.2 | c.*440A>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 2/2 | NP_945354.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
THAP1 | ENST00000254250.7 | c.*156A>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 3/3 | 1 | NM_018105.3 | ENSP00000254250 | P1 | ||
THAP1 | ENST00000345117.2 | c.*440A>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 2/2 | 1 | ENSP00000344966 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000592 AC: 9AN: 152082Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
9
AN:
152082
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000114 AC: 61AN: 535582Hom.: 0 Cov.: 7 AF XY: 0.000117 AC XY: 31AN XY: 265338
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
61
AN:
535582
Hom.:
Cov.:
7
AF XY:
AC XY:
31
AN XY:
265338
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000592 AC: 9AN: 152082Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000673 AC XY: 5AN XY: 74322
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
9
AN:
152082
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
74322
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Torsion dystonia 6 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Feb 02, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at