8-42856296-T-C

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 1P and 5B. PP5BP4BS2

The NM_030954.4(RNF170):c.640A>G(p.Ile214Val) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000125 in 1,586,676 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000072 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00013 ( 5 hom. )

Consequence

RNF170
NM_030954.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications P:2U:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.50

Variant links:

Genes affected

RNF170 (HGNC:25358): (ring finger protein 170) This gene encodes a RING domain-containing protein that resides in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane. This protein functions as an E3 ubiquitin ligase and mediates ubiquitination and processing of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) receptors via the ER-associated protein degradation pathway. It is recruited to the activated IP3 receptors by the ERLIN1/ERLIN2 complex to which it is constitutively bound. Mutations in this gene are associated with autosomal dominant sensory ataxia. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2012]

RNF170 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.

PP5

Variant 8-42856296-T-C is Pathogenic according to our data. Variant chr8-42856296-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 130158.We mark this variant Likely_pathogenic, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=2, Likely_pathogenic=2}. Variant chr8-42856296-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_pathogenic].

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.014598697). . Strength limited to SUPPORTING due to the PP5.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 5 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RNF170	NM_030954.4 link	c.640A>G	p.Ile214Val	missense_variant	Exon 7 of 7	ENST00000527424.6	NP_112216.3	Q96K19-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
RNF170	ENST00000527424.6 link	c.640A>G	p.Ile214Val	missense_variant	Exon 7 of 7	1	NM_030954.4	ENSP00000434797.1		Q96K19-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000723

AC:

AN:

152148

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000231

AC:

AN:

225378

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000368

AC XY:

AN XY:

122268

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00175

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000973

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000563

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000130

AC:

187

AN:

1434410

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000184

AC XY:

131

AN XY:

712576

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000273

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00181

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000952

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000109

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000355

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000722

AC:

AN:

152266

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000107

AC XY:

AN XY:

74450

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00207

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Bravo

AF:

0.0000151

ExAC

AF:

0.000231

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Pathogenic:2Uncertain:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Autosomal dominant sensory ataxia 1

Pathogenic:2

Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genetics and Genomic Medicine Centre, NeuroGen Healthcare, NeuroGen Healthcare	Oct 05, 2019	- -
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago	Mar 06, 2014	- -

not specified

Uncertain:2

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Mendelics	May 04, 2022	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp	Jan 24, 2023	Variant summary: RNF170 c.640A>G (p.Ile214Val) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the domain of unknown function DUF1232 (IPR010652) of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00023 in 225378 control chromosomes, including 2 homozygotes, occurring predominantly at a frequency of 0.0017 within the South Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database, suggesting this variant may be benign. c.640A>G has been reported in the literature in the heterozygous state in an individual affected with spastic paraparesis who underwent WES, however no second variant was identified (Sahin_2022). This report does not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with autosomal recessive spastic paraplegia. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. One clinical diagnostic laboratory has submitted a clinical-significance assessment for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation and classified the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as VUS-possibly benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.073

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.38

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.34

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.97

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.013

T;T;.

Eigen

Benign

-0.19

Eigen_PC

Benign

0.046

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.79

LIST_S2

Benign

0.80

T;.;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.011

MetaRNN

Benign

0.015

T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.61

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.45

N;N;.

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.55

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.33

N;N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.22

Sift

Benign

0.31

T;T;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.52

T;T;T

Polyphen

0.0010

B;B;.

Vest4

0.052

MutPred

0.56

Loss of loop (P = 0.2237);Loss of loop (P = 0.2237);.;

MVP

0.23

MPC

0.29

ClinPred

0.83

GERP RS

4.8

Varity_R

0.043

gMVP

0.64

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over