8-54626835-A-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 2P and 20B. PM5BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_006269.2(RP1):c.2953A>T(p.Asn985Tyr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.385 in 1,613,258 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 125,356 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. N985SP) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006269.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RP1 | NM_006269.2 | c.2953A>T | p.Asn985Tyr | missense_variant | 4/4 | ENST00000220676.2 | NP_006260.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RP1 | ENST00000220676.2 | c.2953A>T | p.Asn985Tyr | missense_variant | 4/4 | 1 | NM_006269.2 | ENSP00000220676.1 | ||
RP1 | ENST00000637698.1 | c.787+4547A>T | intron_variant | 5 | ENSP00000490104.1 | |||||
RP1 | ENST00000636932.1 | c.787+4547A>T | intron_variant | 5 | ENSP00000489857.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.332 AC: 50429AN: 151910Hom.: 9206 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.343 AC: 86181AN: 251018Hom.: 16817 AF XY: 0.356 AC XY: 48299AN XY: 135728
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.390 AC: 570231AN: 1461230Hom.: 116144 Cov.: 56 AF XY: 0.391 AC XY: 284389AN XY: 726936
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.332 AC: 50443AN: 152028Hom.: 9212 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.329 AC XY: 24428AN XY: 74304
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 02, 2020 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 32141364, 12764676) - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Oct 02, 2013 | - - |
Retinitis pigmentosa 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Nov 07, 2021 | - - |
Hypertriglyceridemia 1 Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | Jul 15, 2010 | - - |
Retinal dystrophy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Dept Of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University | Oct 01, 2023 | - - |
Retinitis pigmentosa Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Mar 06, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at