8-60853001-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_017780.4(CHD7):​c.6276G>A​(p.Glu2092=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0534 in 1,613,912 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5,201 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.12 ( 2167 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.047 ( 3034 hom. )

Consequence

CHD7
NM_017780.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.44
Variant links:
Genes affected
CHD7 (HGNC:20626): (chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 7) This gene encodes a protein that contains several helicase family domains. Mutations in this gene have been found in some patients with the CHARGE syndrome. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.48).
BP6
Variant 8-60853001-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-60853001-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 95802.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr8-60853001-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.44 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.301 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
CHD7NM_017780.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.6276G>A p.Glu2092= synonymous_variant 31/38 ENST00000423902.7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
CHD7ENST00000423902.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.6276G>A p.Glu2092= synonymous_variant 31/385 NM_017780.4 P1Q9P2D1-1
CHD7ENST00000524602.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.1717-9228G>A intron_variant 1 Q9P2D1-4
CHD7ENST00000695853.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.6276G>A p.Glu2092= synonymous_variant, NMD_transcript_variant 31/37

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.118
AC:
17995
AN:
152084
Hom.:
2170
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.306
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00439
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0637
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0688
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0160
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0478
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0756
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0918
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0406
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.103
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0611
AC:
15230
AN:
249160
Hom.:
1081
AF XY:
0.0572
AC XY:
7733
AN XY:
135166
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.317
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0359
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0749
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0132
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0464
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0804
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0407
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0565
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0466
AC:
68184
AN:
1461710
Hom.:
3034
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0458
AC XY:
33281
AN XY:
727138
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.315
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0399
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0754
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0165
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0474
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0784
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0368
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0592
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.118
AC:
18002
AN:
152202
Hom.:
2167
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.117
AC XY:
8712
AN XY:
74412
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.305
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0636
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0688
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0159
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0472
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0756
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0406
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.102
Alfa
AF:
0.0606
Hom.:
869
Bravo
AF:
0.123
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0440
AC:
154
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0376
EpiControl
AF:
0.0381

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:8
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineAug 23, 2017p.Glu2092Glu in exon 31 of CHD7: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located with in the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 30.76% (3016/9804) of African chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.br oadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs2068096). -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoFeb 08, 2013- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Aug 03, 2015- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesAug 24, 2018- -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsJul 25, 2018- -
CHARGE syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMar 16, 2016This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism 5 with or without anosmia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.48
CADD
Benign
2.1
DANN
Benign
0.44
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.8

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2068096; hg19: chr8-61765560; API