8-71271884-G-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000503.6(EYA1):​c.840C>A​(p.Ile280=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00404 in 1,614,148 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 21 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0028 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0042 ( 20 hom. )

Consequence

EYA1
NM_000503.6 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.26
Variant links:
Genes affected
EYA1 (HGNC:3519): (EYA transcriptional coactivator and phosphatase 1) This gene encodes a member of the eyes absent (EYA) family of proteins. The encoded protein may play a role in the developing kidney, branchial arches, eye, and ear. Mutations of this gene have been associated with branchiootorenal dysplasia syndrome, branchiootic syndrome, and sporadic cases of congenital cataracts and ocular anterior segment anomalies. A similar protein in mice can act as a transcriptional activator. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been identified for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2013]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.42).
BP6
Variant 8-71271884-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-71271884-G-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 163435.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr8-71271884-G-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr8-71271884-G-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=3.26 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00278 (424/152288) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.00484 (74/15298). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00421. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 202 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 424 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
EYA1NM_000503.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.840C>A p.Ile280= synonymous_variant 10/18 ENST00000340726.8 NP_000494.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
EYA1ENST00000340726.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.840C>A p.Ile280= synonymous_variant 10/181 NM_000503.6 ENSP00000342626 P4Q99502-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00279
AC:
424
AN:
152170
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000676
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00484
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000943
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00463
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00287
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00236
AC:
593
AN:
251476
Hom.:
2
AF XY:
0.00244
AC XY:
331
AN XY:
135908
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00105
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00306
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000298
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000370
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00388
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00293
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00417
AC:
6100
AN:
1461860
Hom.:
20
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00400
AC XY:
2910
AN XY:
727232
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000806
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00329
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000536
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000262
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00510
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00384
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00278
AC:
424
AN:
152288
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00271
AC XY:
202
AN XY:
74462
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000674
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00484
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0000943
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00463
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00284
Alfa
AF:
0.00314
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00298
EpiCase
AF:
0.00453
EpiControl
AF:
0.00462

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:6
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenJul 01, 2024EYA1: BP4, BP7, BS2 -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsNov 27, 2018- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxApr 28, 2021- -
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMay 07, 2012Ile280Ile in Exon 09 of EYA1: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located within the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 0.5% (32/7020) of Eur opean American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs55972891). -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Aug 30, 2016- -
Branchiootic syndrome 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
EYA1-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesApr 12, 2019This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Melnick-Fraser syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 24, 2024- -
Otofaciocervical syndrome 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Branchiootic syndrome 1;C3714941:Otofaciocervical syndrome 1;C4551702:Branchiootorenal syndrome 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsSep 13, 2021- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.42
CADD
Benign
6.7
DANN
Benign
0.73

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs55972891; hg19: chr8-72184119; API