8-71299060-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000503.6(EYA1):​c.813A>G​(p.Thr271Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0998 in 1,613,700 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 11,653 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.091 ( 1078 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.10 ( 10575 hom. )

Consequence

EYA1
NM_000503.6 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.224

Publications

22 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
EYA1 (HGNC:3519): (EYA transcriptional coactivator and phosphatase 1) This gene encodes a member of the eyes absent (EYA) family of proteins. The encoded protein may play a role in the developing kidney, branchial arches, eye, and ear. Mutations of this gene have been associated with branchiootorenal dysplasia syndrome, branchiootic syndrome, and sporadic cases of congenital cataracts and ocular anterior segment anomalies. A similar protein in mice can act as a transcriptional activator. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been identified for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2013]
EYA1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • branchio-oto-renal syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
  • branchiootorenal syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • branchiootic syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia
  • branchiootic syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.65).
BP6
Variant 8-71299060-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-71299060-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 48109.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.224 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.421 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
EYA1NM_000503.6 linkc.813A>G p.Thr271Thr synonymous_variant Exon 9 of 18 ENST00000340726.8 NP_000494.2 Q99502-1A0A024R813B3KXR1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
EYA1ENST00000340726.8 linkc.813A>G p.Thr271Thr synonymous_variant Exon 9 of 18 1 NM_000503.6 ENSP00000342626.3 Q99502-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0914
AC:
13906
AN:
152120
Hom.:
1078
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0387
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00439
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.176
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0573
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.436
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.106
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0646
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0411
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0849
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0841
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.130
AC:
32752
AN:
251456
AF XY:
0.122
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0348
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.260
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0655
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.432
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0688
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0839
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.113
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.101
AC:
147121
AN:
1461462
Hom.:
10575
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0993
AC XY:
72166
AN XY:
727068
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0367
AC:
1229
AN:
33478
American (AMR)
AF:
0.250
AC:
11186
AN:
44712
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0654
AC:
1709
AN:
26132
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.417
AC:
16543
AN:
39688
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0945
AC:
8151
AN:
86254
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0761
AC:
4064
AN:
53420
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0496
AC:
286
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0878
AC:
97570
AN:
1111630
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.106
AC:
6383
AN:
60380
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.478
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
6537
13075
19612
26150
32687
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
3878
7756
11634
15512
19390
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0914
AC:
13916
AN:
152238
Hom.:
1078
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0939
AC XY:
6988
AN XY:
74432
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0386
AC:
1603
AN:
41560
American (AMR)
AF:
0.177
AC:
2706
AN:
15298
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0573
AC:
199
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.436
AC:
2243
AN:
5144
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.106
AC:
513
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0646
AC:
685
AN:
10604
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0442
AC:
13
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0848
AC:
5771
AN:
68020
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0847
AC:
179
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.496
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
594
1188
1781
2375
2969
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
160
320
480
640
800
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0908
Hom.:
2773
Bravo
AF:
0.103
Asia WGS
AF:
0.250
AC:
867
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Branchiootic syndrome 1 Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Aug 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:2
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 02, 2011
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

The Thr271Thr variant has been reported in dbSNP in over ten populations with mi nor allele frequencies as high as 53% (rs1445398). In addition, the variant does not result in an amino acid substitution nor is it predicted to impact splicing . Therfore, this variant is highly likely to be benign. -

not provided Benign:2
Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Otofaciocervical syndrome 1 Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Aug 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Melnick-Fraser syndrome Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Branchiootorenal syndrome 1 Benign:1
Aug 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.65
CADD
Benign
4.3
DANN
Benign
0.70
PhyloP100
-0.22
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1445398; hg19: chr8-72211295; COSMIC: COSV58172026; API