8-85107309-C-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The ENST00000360375.8(LRRCC1):c.14C>A(p.Ala5Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000854 in 1,611,712 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000360375.8 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRRCC1 | NM_033402.5 | c.14C>A | p.Ala5Glu | missense_variant | 1/19 | ENST00000360375.8 | NP_208325.3 | |
LOC105375933 | XR_929117.3 | n.304+250G>T | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRRCC1 | ENST00000360375.8 | c.14C>A | p.Ala5Glu | missense_variant | 1/19 | 1 | NM_033402.5 | ENSP00000353538 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00424 AC: 645AN: 152206Hom.: 5 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00129 AC: 311AN: 240820Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000858 AC XY: 113AN XY: 131678
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000500 AC: 730AN: 1459388Hom.: 3 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000424 AC XY: 308AN XY: 725966
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00424 AC: 646AN: 152324Hom.: 5 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00404 AC XY: 301AN XY: 74482
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 11, 2023 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at