8-86667075-A-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_019098.5(CNGB3):c.702T>G(p.Cys234Trp) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.857 in 1,613,820 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 594,751 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. C234S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_019098.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- achromatopsia 3Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, PanelApp Australia
- CNGB3-related retinopathyInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- cone dystrophyInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- achromatopsiaInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- severe early-childhood-onset retinal dystrophyInheritance: Unknown Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNGB3 | ENST00000320005.6 | c.702T>G | p.Cys234Trp | missense_variant | Exon 6 of 18 | 1 | NM_019098.5 | ENSP00000316605.5 | ||
| CNGB3 | ENST00000681746.1 | n.702T>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 6 of 19 | ENSP00000505959.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.893 AC: 135739AN: 152048Hom.: 60875 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.892 AC: 224365AN: 251402 AF XY: 0.893 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.853 AC: 1246827AN: 1461654Hom.: 533812 Cov.: 58 AF XY: 0.857 AC XY: 622898AN XY: 727124 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.893 AC: 135864AN: 152166Hom.: 60939 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.897 AC XY: 66690AN XY: 74372 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
- -
- -
- -
- -
Achromatopsia 3 Benign:3
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
- -
- -
not provided Benign:3
- -
- -
This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 26106334) -
Achromatopsia Benign:1
- -
Severe early-childhood-onset retinal dystrophy Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at