8-89943291-T-C

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_002485.5(NBN):c.2146A>G(p.Asn716Asp) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00145 in 1,613,746 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 34 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0076 ( 17 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00080 ( 17 hom. )

Consequence

NBN
NM_002485.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:16O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.72

Variant links:

Genes affected

NBN (HGNC:7652): (nibrin) Mutations in this gene are associated with Nijmegen breakage syndrome, an autosomal recessive chromosomal instability syndrome characterized by microcephaly, growth retardation, immunodeficiency, and cancer predisposition. The encoded protein is a member of the MRE11/RAD50 double-strand break repair complex which consists of 5 proteins. This gene product is thought to be involved in DNA double-strand break repair and DNA damage-induced checkpoint activation. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

NBN links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.005399674).

BP6

Variant 8-89943291-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-89943291-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 134874.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr8-89943291-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00764 (1164/152280) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.027 (1122/41552). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0257. There are 17 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 539 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 17 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
NBN	NM_002485.5 link	c.2146A>G	p.Asn716Asp	missense_variant	Exon 14 of 16	ENST00000265433.8	NP_002476.2	O60934

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
NBN	ENST00000265433.8 link	c.2146A>G	p.Asn716Asp	missense_variant	Exon 14 of 16	1	NM_002485.5	ENSP00000265433.4		O60934

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00760

AC:

1157

AN:

152162

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0269

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00196

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000735

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00335

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00196

AC:

493

AN:

251350

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00150

AC XY:

204

AN XY:

135840

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0265

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00133

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000653

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000792

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000978

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000801

AC:

1170

AN:

1461466

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000707

AC XY:

514

AN XY:

727048

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0287

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00161

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000580

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000306

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00157

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00764

AC:

1164

AN:

152280

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00724

AC XY:

539

AN XY:

74488

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0270

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00196

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000735

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00331

Alfa

AF:

0.00141

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00894

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.0266

AC:

117

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00243

AC:

295

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000577

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:16Other:1

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:5Other:1

Sep 27, 2017

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

The NBN p.Asn716Asp variant was identified in 1 of 164 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.006) from individuals or families with cancer and was present in 5 of 1362 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.004) from healthy individuals (Wang 2013, Bodian 2014). The variant was also identified in the following databases: dbSNP (ID: rs72563785) as "With other allele", ClinVar (5x benign, 1x uncertain significance), Clinvitae, and Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database. The variant was not identified in the Cosmic or LOVD 3.0 databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 716 of 277088 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.003 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). The variant was identified in the following populations at a frequency greater than 1%: African in 651 of 24032 chromosomes (freq: 0.03). The p.Asn716 residue is conserved in mammals but not in more distantly related organisms. However four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -

Sep 19, 2013

ITMI

Significance: not provided

Review Status: no classification provided

Collection Method: reference population

- -

Jun 25, 2021

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 23, 2013

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Aug 19, 2015

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Microcephaly, normal intelligence and immunodeficiency

Benign:3

Jan 31, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 31, 2019

Natera, Inc.

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided

Benign:3

May 02, 2016

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: The c.2146A>G variant affects a conserved nucleotide, resulting in amino acid change from Asn to Asp. 3/4 in-silico tools predict this variant to be benign. This variant is found in 295/121388 control chromosomes (including 5 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.0024302. It was predominantly observed in the African subpopulation at a frequency of 2.7% including 5 homozygous occurrences. This frequency significantly exceeds the maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in NBN (0.25%), suggesting this is a benign polymorphism found primarily in population(s) of African origin. In addition, multiple clinical laboratories have classified this variant as benign/likely benign. One internal sample with this variant also carried a deleterious variant PMS2 c.2186_2187delTC, supporting bening outcome. Taken together, this variant has been classified as Benign. -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Jan 06, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:3

Jul 28, 2014

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Sep 11, 2017

True Health Diagnostics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 04, 2016

Vantari Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aplastic anemia;C0023449:Acute lymphoid leukemia;C0398791:Microcephaly, normal intelligence and immunodeficiency

Benign:1

May 25, 2022

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Benign:1

Apr 19, 2022

National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.20

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.56

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.56

CADD

Uncertain

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.25

T;T;.

Eigen

Benign

0.11

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.26

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.87

LIST_S2

Benign

0.78

T;D;T

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0054

T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.92

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.5

L;.;.

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.58

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.7

N;N;.

REVEL

Benign

0.15

Sift

Benign

0.085

T;T;.

Sift4G

Benign

0.10

T;T;T

Polyphen

0.14

B;.;.

Vest4

0.16

MVP

0.70

MPC

0.21

ClinPred

0.015

GERP RS

5.8

Varity_R

0.20

gMVP

0.44

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over