8-89953312-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_002485.5(NBN):​c.1777C>G​(p.Pro593Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000105 in 1,613,202 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P593S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00057 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000057 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

NBN
NM_002485.5 missense

Scores

18

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:5B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.59

Publications

2 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
NBN (HGNC:7652): (nibrin) Mutations in this gene are associated with Nijmegen breakage syndrome, an autosomal recessive chromosomal instability syndrome characterized by microcephaly, growth retardation, immunodeficiency, and cancer predisposition. The encoded protein is a member of the MRE11/RAD50 double-strand break repair complex which consists of 5 proteins. This gene product is thought to be involved in DNA double-strand break repair and DNA damage-induced checkpoint activation. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
NBN Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Nijmegen breakage syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Myriad Women’s Health
  • rhabdomyosarcoma
    Inheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • idiopathic aplastic anemia
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • prostate cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • hereditary breast carcinoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0047795773).
BP6
Variant 8-89953312-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-89953312-G-C is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 127862.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000566 (86/152068) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00202 (84/41490). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00168. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 41 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
NBNNM_002485.5 linkc.1777C>G p.Pro593Ala missense_variant Exon 11 of 16 ENST00000265433.8 NP_002476.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
NBNENST00000265433.8 linkc.1777C>G p.Pro593Ala missense_variant Exon 11 of 16 1 NM_002485.5 ENSP00000265433.4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000566
AC:
86
AN:
151950
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00203
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000163
AC:
41
AN:
250866
AF XY:
0.000177
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00246
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000289
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000568
AC:
83
AN:
1461134
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000619
AC XY:
45
AN XY:
726898
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00233
AC:
78
AN:
33466
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000447
AC:
2
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26120
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39644
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
86240
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
52996
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5762
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
1111806
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0000497
AC:
3
AN:
60378
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.466
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
6
11
17
22
28
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000566
AC:
86
AN:
152068
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000551
AC XY:
41
AN XY:
74344
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00202
AC:
84
AN:
41490
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000131
AC:
2
AN:
15258
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5182
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10586
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
67932
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.497
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
4
9
13
18
22
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0000225
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000740
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00182
AC:
8
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.000214
AC:
26

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Microcephaly, normal intelligence and immunodeficiency Uncertain:2Benign:2
May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 29, 2021
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Nov 07, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Jan 18, 2019
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: NBN c.1777C>G (p.Pro593Ala) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00019 in 276572 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0022 within the African subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within African control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 17.6 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in NBN causing Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer phenotype (0.00013), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African origin. c.1777C>G has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Breast and Ovarian Cancer (Haiman_2013, Tung_2014). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. Co-occurrences with other pathogenic variant(s) have been reported (BRCA2 c.2808_2811delACAA, p.Ala938fsX21), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Five clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation, 4 classify as VUS while 1 classified as likley benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign.

Apr 27, 2016
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Dec 08, 2022
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

May 05, 2023
GeneDx
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Observed in individuals with a personal or family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer (Haiman et al., 2013; Tung et al., 2015); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 23555315, 25186627)

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Dec 21, 2021
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

Jul 13, 2021
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

NBN-related disorder Benign:1
Mar 17, 2022
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.10
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.42
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.38
CADD
Benign
17
DANN
Benign
0.92
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.21
T;T;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.64
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.58
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.12
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.77
T;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.0078
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0048
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.99
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.7
L;.;.
PhyloP100
1.6
PrimateAI
Benign
0.34
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.1
N;N;.
REVEL
Benign
0.038
Sift
Benign
0.13
T;T;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.42
T;T;T
Vest4
0.19
ClinPred
0.0064
T
GERP RS
3.5
PromoterAI
-0.022
Neutral
Varity_R
0.052
gMVP
0.065
Mutation Taster
=95/5
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs146989944; hg19: chr8-90965540; API