8-99853454-G-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_152564.5(VPS13B):c.10065G>T(p.Ala3355Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0219 in 1,614,024 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 430 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.017 ( 23 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.022 ( 407 hom. )
Consequence
VPS13B
NM_152564.5 synonymous
NM_152564.5 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.231
Genes affected
VPS13B (HGNC:2183): (vacuolar protein sorting 13 homolog B) This gene encodes a potential transmembrane protein that may function in vesicle-mediated transport and sorting of proteins within the cell. This protein may play a role in the development and the function of the eye, hematological system, and central nervous system. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Cohen syndrome. Multiple splice variants encoding distinct isoforms have been identified for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.89).
BP6
Variant 8-99853454-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-99853454-G-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 459245.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr8-99853454-G-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.231 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0173 (2634/152290) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0258 (1756/68018). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0248. There are 23 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 1225 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 23 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VPS13B | ENST00000358544.7 | c.10140G>T | p.Ala3380Ala | synonymous_variant | 56/62 | 1 | NM_017890.5 | ENSP00000351346.2 | ||
VPS13B | ENST00000357162.7 | c.10065G>T | p.Ala3355Ala | synonymous_variant | 56/62 | 1 | NM_152564.5 | ENSP00000349685.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0173 AC: 2635AN: 152172Hom.: 23 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
2635
AN:
152172
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0174 AC: 4356AN: 250630Hom.: 48 AF XY: 0.0181 AC XY: 2454AN XY: 135560
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
4356
AN:
250630
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
2454
AN XY:
135560
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0224 AC: 32788AN: 1461734Hom.: 407 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0221 AC XY: 16041AN XY: 727156
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
32788
AN:
1461734
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
16041
AN XY:
727156
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0173 AC: 2634AN: 152290Hom.: 23 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0164 AC XY: 1225AN XY: 74468
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
2634
AN:
152290
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
1225
AN XY:
74468
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
16
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Cohen syndrome Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | Jun 28, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | Oct 10, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Sep 19, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Nov 10, 2022 | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 14, 2016 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at