9-101420690-G-A

Position:

• chr9-101420690-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_Strong BS2

The NM_000035.4(ALDOB):​c.*1119C>T variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00262 in 152,166 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0026 (4 hom., cov: 32)
  • Failed GnomAD Quality Control
• Consequence: ALDOB NM_000035.4 3_prime_UTR
• Clinical Significance: Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -0.976

Genes affected

ALDOB (HGNC:417): (aldolase, fructose-bisphosphate B) Fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase (EC 4.1.2.13) is a tetrameric glycolytic enzyme that catalyzes the reversible conversion of fructose-1,6-bisphosphate to glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate and dihydroxyacetone phosphate. Vertebrates have 3 aldolase isozymes which are distinguished by their electrophoretic and catalytic properties. Differences indicate that aldolases A, B, and C are distinct proteins, the products of a family of related 'housekeeping' genes exhibiting developmentally regulated expression of the different isozymes. The developing embryo produces aldolase A, which is produced in even greater amounts in adult muscle where it can be as much as 5% of total cellular protein. In adult liver, kidney and intestine, aldolase A expression is repressed and aldolase B is produced. In brain and other nervous tissue, aldolase A and C are expressed about equally. There is a high degree of homology between aldolase A and C. Defects in ALDOB cause hereditary fructose intolerance. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2008]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.83).
• BS2: High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 4 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
ALDOB	NM_000035.4	c.*1119C>T		3_prime_UTR_variant	9/9	ENST00000647789.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
ALDOB	ENST00000647789.2	c.*1119C>T		3_prime_UTR_variant	9/9		NM_000035.4	P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00262 AC: 399 AN: 152048 Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.000338

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.000197

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.0182

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.00276

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.000478

GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0 AC: 0 AN: 0 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 0 AC XY: 0 AN XY: 0

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00262 AC: 399 AN: 152166 Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00335 AC XY: 249 AN XY: 74382

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.000337

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.000196

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.0182

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.00276

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.000473

Alfa AF: 0.00341 Hom.: 2

Bravo AF: 0.00108

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary fructosuria Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.83
CADD	Benign	0.29
DANN	Benign	0.62

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs41296051; hg19: chr9-104182972;