9-101429815-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBS2_Supporting
The NM_000035.4(ALDOB):c.264C>A(p.Asp88Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000197 in 1,614,144 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000035.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALDOB | NM_000035.4 | c.264C>A | p.Asp88Glu | missense_variant | 3/9 | ENST00000647789.2 | NP_000026.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALDOB | ENST00000647789.2 | c.264C>A | p.Asp88Glu | missense_variant | 3/9 | NM_000035.4 | ENSP00000497767.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000145 AC: 22AN: 152138Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000422 AC: 106AN: 251246Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000537 AC XY: 73AN XY: 135826
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000202 AC: 295AN: 1461888Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000322 AC XY: 234AN XY: 727248
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000151 AC: 23AN: 152256Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000215 AC XY: 16AN XY: 74434
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary fructosuria Pathogenic:1Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | ATS em Genética Clínica, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul | Mar 18, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Nov 03, 2021 | NM_000035.3(ALDOB):c.264C>A(D88E) is a missense variant classified as a variant of uncertain significance in the context of hereditary fructose intolerance. D88E has been observed in in cases with relevant disease (PMID: 26633542). Functional assessments of this variant are not available in the literature. D88E has been observed in population frequency databases (gnomAD: SAS 0.34%). In summary, there is insufficient evidence to classify NM_000035.3(ALDOB):c.264C>A(D88E) as pathogenic or benign. Please note: this variant was assessed in the context of healthy population screening. - |
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 29, 2016 | The D88E variant in the ALDOB gene has not been reported previously as a pathogenic variant nor as a benign polymorphism, to our knowledge. The D88E variant was not observed in approximately 6,500 individuals of European and African American ancestry in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project; however, the D88E variant was observed in the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) data set on 0.39% of alleles (60/16512) from individuals of South Asian background, including one homozygous individual, indicating it may be a rare benign variant in this population. The D88E variant is a conservative amino acid substitution, which occurs at a position that is conserved among mammals. In silico analysis is inconsistent in its predictions as to whether or not the variant is damaging to the protein structure/function. Based on review of the current data in the context of the 2015 ACMG standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants (Richards et al., 2015), we now interpret D88E as a variant of uncertain significance. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Oct 12, 2017 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at