9-108882151-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_003640.5(ELP1):c.3259G>A(p.Ala1087Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000471 in 1,613,512 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003640.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ELP1 | NM_003640.5 | c.3259G>A | p.Ala1087Thr | missense_variant | 30/37 | ENST00000374647.10 | NP_003631.2 | |
ELP1 | NM_001318360.2 | c.2917G>A | p.Ala973Thr | missense_variant | 30/37 | NP_001305289.1 | ||
ELP1 | NM_001330749.2 | c.2212G>A | p.Ala738Thr | missense_variant | 28/35 | NP_001317678.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ELP1 | ENST00000374647.10 | c.3259G>A | p.Ala1087Thr | missense_variant | 30/37 | 1 | NM_003640.5 | ENSP00000363779.5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000591 AC: 9AN: 152172Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000558 AC: 14AN: 250910Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000516 AC XY: 7AN XY: 135634
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000458 AC: 67AN: 1461340Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000468 AC XY: 34AN XY: 727000
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000591 AC: 9AN: 152172Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000404 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74344
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Familial dysautonomia Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Jan 17, 2020 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 18, 2021 | Not observed at a significant frequency in large population cohorts (Lek et al., 2016); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Aug 02, 2022 | This sequence change replaces alanine, which is neutral and non-polar, with threonine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 1087 of the ELP1 protein (p.Ala1087Thr). This variant is present in population databases (rs61749203, gnomAD 0.007%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with ELP1-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 364561). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function output the following: SIFT: "Tolerated"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0". The threonine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 15, 2023 | The c.3259G>A (p.A1087T) alteration is located in exon 30 (coding exon 29) of the IKBKAP gene. This alteration results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 3259, causing the alanine (A) at amino acid position 1087 to be replaced by a threonine (T). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Familial dysautonomia;C0025149:Medulloblastoma Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Oct 03, 2021 | - - |
Medulloblastoma Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | St. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital | Nov 11, 2021 | The ELP1 c.3259G>A (p.Ala1087Thr) missense change has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.0097% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/9-111644431-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r2_1). Five of seven in silico tools predict a benign effect of this variant on protein function (BP4), but to our knowledge these predictions have not been confirmed by functional assays. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in individuals with a personal or family history of medulloblastoma. In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as of uncertain significance based on the ACMG/AMP criteria: BP4 - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at