9-108906372-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_003640.5(ELP1):c.1574G>A(p.Arg525Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0597 in 1,613,862 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3,364 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003640.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ELP1 | NM_003640.5 | c.1574G>A | p.Arg525Gln | missense_variant | 14/37 | ENST00000374647.10 | NP_003631.2 | |
ELP1 | NM_001318360.2 | c.1232G>A | p.Arg411Gln | missense_variant | 14/37 | NP_001305289.1 | ||
ELP1 | NM_001330749.2 | c.527G>A | p.Arg176Gln | missense_variant | 12/35 | NP_001317678.1 | ||
ELP1 | XM_047423991.1 | c.1574G>A | p.Arg525Gln | missense_variant | 14/25 | XP_047279947.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ELP1 | ENST00000374647.10 | c.1574G>A | p.Arg525Gln | missense_variant | 14/37 | 1 | NM_003640.5 | ENSP00000363779.5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0697 AC: 10604AN: 152080Hom.: 480 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0511 AC: 12831AN: 251282Hom.: 432 AF XY: 0.0504 AC XY: 6849AN XY: 135806
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0587 AC: 85735AN: 1461664Hom.: 2886 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0577 AC XY: 41960AN XY: 727150
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0697 AC: 10601AN: 152198Hom.: 478 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0684 AC XY: 5092AN XY: 74416
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Familial dysautonomia Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 01, 2021 | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 29, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 20, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at