9-109057284-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_032012.4(TMEM245):c.1761G>C(p.Leu587Phe) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,461,782 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another nucleotide change resulting in the same amino acid substitution has been previously reported as Uncertain significance in ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_032012.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMEM245 | ENST00000374586.8 | c.1761G>C | p.Leu587Phe | missense_variant | Exon 12 of 18 | 1 | NM_032012.4 | ENSP00000363714.3 | ||
TMEM245 | ENST00000413712.7 | c.1737G>C | p.Leu579Phe | missense_variant | Exon 11 of 17 | 2 | ENSP00000394798.3 | |||
TMEM245 | ENST00000491854.1 | n.*333G>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 10 of 16 | 2 | ENSP00000417842.1 | ||||
TMEM245 | ENST00000491854.1 | n.*333G>C | 3_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 10 of 16 | 2 | ENSP00000417842.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000401 AC: 1AN: 249418 AF XY: 0.00 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461782Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 727192 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at