9-114402717-G-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_015404.4(WHRN):c.*37C>G variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000997 in 1,612,544 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 22 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00058 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0010 ( 21 hom. )
Consequence
WHRN
NM_015404.4 3_prime_UTR
NM_015404.4 3_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.0240
Genes affected
WHRN (HGNC:16361): (whirlin) This gene is thought to function in the organization and stabilization of sterocilia elongation and actin cystoskeletal assembly, based on studies of the related mouse gene. Mutations in this gene have been associated with autosomal recessive non-syndromic deafness and Usher Syndrome. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2016]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.84).
BP6
Variant 9-114402717-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-114402717-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 364678.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000584 (89/152386) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0182 (88/4834). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0151. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 71 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 21 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WHRN | NM_015404.4 | c.*37C>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 12/12 | ENST00000362057.4 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WHRN | ENST00000362057.4 | c.*37C>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 12/12 | 1 | NM_015404.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000604 AC: 92AN: 152268Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
92
AN:
152268
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00221 AC: 553AN: 250518Hom.: 8 AF XY: 0.00299 AC XY: 406AN XY: 135598
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
553
AN:
250518
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
406
AN XY:
135598
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00104 AC: 1518AN: 1460158Hom.: 21 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00149 AC XY: 1085AN XY: 726480
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1518
AN:
1460158
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
1085
AN XY:
726480
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000584 AC: 89AN: 152386Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000953 AC XY: 71AN XY: 74522
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
89
AN:
152386
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
71
AN XY:
74522
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 31 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 20, 2020 | - - |
Usher syndrome type 2D Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at