9-114424432-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_015404.4(WHRN):c.1318G>A(p.Ala440Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.232 in 1,613,244 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 46,248 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_015404.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WHRN | NM_015404.4 | c.1318G>A | p.Ala440Thr | missense_variant | 6/12 | ENST00000362057.4 | NP_056219.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WHRN | ENST00000362057.4 | c.1318G>A | p.Ala440Thr | missense_variant | 6/12 | 1 | NM_015404.4 | ENSP00000354623 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.202 AC: 30683AN: 152040Hom.: 3627 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.262 AC: 65724AN: 251210Hom.: 9677 AF XY: 0.257 AC XY: 34927AN XY: 135818
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.235 AC: 343333AN: 1461086Hom.: 42613 Cov.: 53 AF XY: 0.236 AC XY: 171366AN XY: 726842
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.202 AC: 30714AN: 152158Hom.: 3635 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.205 AC XY: 15251AN XY: 74382
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Nov 11, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Jun 12, 2009 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Feb 26, 2016 | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 31 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 30, 2021 | - - |
Retinitis pigmentosa-deafness syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Usher syndrome type 2D Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at