9-120539099-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_018249.6(CDK5RAP2):c.449G>A(p.Arg150Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000057 in 1,613,858 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_018249.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDK5RAP2 | NM_018249.6 | c.449G>A | p.Arg150Gln | missense_variant | 6/38 | ENST00000349780.9 | NP_060719.4 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDK5RAP2 | ENST00000349780.9 | c.449G>A | p.Arg150Gln | missense_variant | 6/38 | 1 | NM_018249.6 | ENSP00000343818.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000394 AC: 6AN: 152214Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000557 AC: 14AN: 251332Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000736 AC XY: 10AN XY: 135822
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000588 AC: 86AN: 1461644Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000729 AC XY: 53AN XY: 727132
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000394 AC: 6AN: 152214Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000538 AC XY: 4AN XY: 74376
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Feb 02, 2016 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 30, 2019 | Not observed at a significant frequency in large population cohorts (Lek et al., 2016); In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; In-silico analysis, which includes splice predictors and evolutionary conservation, is inconclusive as to whether the variant alters gene splicing. In the absence of RNA/functional studies, the actual effect of this sequence change is unknown; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge - |
Microcephaly 3, primary, autosomal recessive Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Service de Génétique Moléculaire, Hôpital Robert Debré | - | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at