9-130458605-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_054012.4(ASS1):​c.363+16A>G variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000794 in 1,610,084 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 23 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0014 ( 2 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00073 ( 21 hom. )

Consequence

ASS1
NM_054012.4 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: -4.20

Publications

2 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
ASS1 (HGNC:758): (argininosuccinate synthase 1) The protein encoded by this gene catalyzes the penultimate step of the arginine biosynthetic pathway. There are approximately 10 to 14 copies of this gene including the pseudogenes scattered across the human genome, among which the one located on chromosome 9 appears to be the only functional gene for argininosuccinate synthetase. Mutations in the chromosome 9 copy of this gene cause citrullinemia. Two transcript variants encoding the same protein have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2012]
ASS1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • citrullinemia type I
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Myriad Women’s Health, G2P
  • acute neonatal citrullinemia type I
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • adult-onset citrullinemia type I
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.88).
BP6
Variant 9-130458605-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-130458605-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 254744.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00139 (212/152346) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.0353 (183/5180). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0311. There are 2 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 109 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR gene

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_054012.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
ASS1
NM_054012.4
MANE Select
c.363+16A>G
intron
N/ANP_446464.1
ASS1
NM_000050.4
c.363+16A>G
intron
N/ANP_000041.2

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
ASS1
ENST00000352480.10
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.363+16A>G
intron
N/AENSP00000253004.6
ASS1
ENST00000372393.7
TSL:5
c.363+16A>G
intron
N/AENSP00000361469.2
ASS1
ENST00000372394.5
TSL:2
c.363+16A>G
intron
N/AENSP00000361471.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00139
AC:
211
AN:
152228
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000145
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000458
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0352
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00249
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00143
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00300
AC:
717
AN:
239378
AF XY:
0.00277
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000704
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000118
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0371
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00220
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000731
AC:
1066
AN:
1457738
Hom.:
21
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000698
AC XY:
506
AN XY:
724894
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000898
AC:
3
AN:
33394
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000901
AC:
4
AN:
44380
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26066
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0196
AC:
778
AN:
39636
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00112
AC:
96
AN:
85772
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
52418
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5068
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00000720
AC:
8
AN:
1110822
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00294
AC:
177
AN:
60182
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.487
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
67
134
202
269
336
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
28
56
84
112
140
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00139
AC:
212
AN:
152346
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00146
AC XY:
109
AN XY:
74492
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000144
AC:
6
AN:
41598
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000457
AC:
7
AN:
15306
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0353
AC:
183
AN:
5180
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00249
AC:
12
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10618
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
68026
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00189
AC:
4
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.514
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
11
23
34
46
57
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000342
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00128
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0200
AC:
68
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Oct 12, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Citrullinemia Benign:2
Feb 02, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.88
CADD
Benign
0.074
DANN
Benign
0.52
PhyloP100
-4.2
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs191432165; hg19: chr9-133333992; API