9-132896448-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000368.5(TSC1):​c.3282G>A​(p.Glu1094Glu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00132 in 1,614,220 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0043 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0010 ( 8 hom. )

Consequence

TSC1
NM_000368.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:20O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.60

Publications

6 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TSC1 (HGNC:12362): (TSC complex subunit 1) This gene is a tumor suppressor gene that encodes the growth inhibitory protein hamartin. The encoded protein interacts with and stabilizes the GTPase activating protein tuberin. This hamartin-tuberin complex negatively regulates mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling which is a major regulator of anabolic cell growth. This protein also functions as a co-chaperone for Hsp90 that inhibits its ATPase activity. This protein functions as a facilitator of Hsp90-mediated folding of kinase and non-kinase clients, including TSC2 and thereby preventing their ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. Mutations in this gene have been associated with tuberous sclerosis and lymphangioleiomyomatosis. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]
TSC1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • tuberous sclerosis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • tuberous sclerosis 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, PanelApp Australia, Genomics England PanelApp, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • lung lymphangioleiomyomatosis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • tuberous sclerosis complex
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.39).
BP6
Variant 9-132896448-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-132896448-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 49019.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.6 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00427 (650/152326) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0123 (513/41570). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0115. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 312 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 650 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TSC1NM_000368.5 linkc.3282G>A p.Glu1094Glu synonymous_variant Exon 23 of 23 ENST00000298552.9 NP_000359.1 Q92574-1Q86WV8X5D9D2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TSC1ENST00000298552.9 linkc.3282G>A p.Glu1094Glu synonymous_variant Exon 23 of 23 1 NM_000368.5 ENSP00000298552.3 Q92574-1
TSC1ENST00000490179.4 linkc.3282G>A p.Glu1094Glu synonymous_variant Exon 24 of 24 3 ENSP00000495533.2 A0A2R8Y6S8

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00426
AC:
649
AN:
152208
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0124
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00419
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00807
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000941
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000559
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00287
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00176
AC:
443
AN:
251462
AF XY:
0.00157
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0140
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00214
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00456
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000185
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000668
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00228
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00101
AC:
1483
AN:
1461894
Hom.:
8
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00100
AC XY:
729
AN XY:
727248
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0148
AC:
497
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00212
AC:
95
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00467
AC:
122
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000927
AC:
8
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000749
AC:
4
AN:
53420
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00364
AC:
21
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000527
AC:
586
AN:
1112012
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00248
AC:
150
AN:
60396
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.480
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
113
226
340
453
566
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
36
72
108
144
180
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00427
AC:
650
AN:
152326
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00419
AC XY:
312
AN XY:
74496
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0123
AC:
513
AN:
41570
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00418
AC:
64
AN:
15304
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00807
AC:
28
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5180
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4832
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000941
AC:
1
AN:
10626
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000559
AC:
38
AN:
68026
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00284
AC:
6
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.508
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
32
65
97
130
162
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00208
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00505
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00173
AC:
6
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00104
EpiControl
AF:
0.00107

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:20Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
Oct 23, 2020
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 16, 2021
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 21, 2013
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Glu1094Glu in exon 23 of TSC1: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located wit hin the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 1.3% (58/4406) of A frican American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencin g Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs116747861). -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Tuberous sclerosis 1 Benign:6
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Apr 30, 2025
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -

May 30, 2017
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 07, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:4
Aug 02, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

TSC1: BP4, BS1 -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Tuberous sclerosis syndrome Benign:1Other:1
-
Tuberous sclerosis database (TSC1)
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:curation

- -

Sep 30, 2022
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Lymphangiomyomatosis;C1846385:Isolated focal cortical dysplasia type II;C1854465:Tuberous sclerosis 1 Benign:1
Sep 15, 2023
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Isolated focal cortical dysplasia type II Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Apr 20, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.39
CADD
Benign
8.3
DANN
Benign
0.51
PhyloP100
1.6
Mutation Taster
=86/14
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs116747861; hg19: chr9-135771835; API