9-132903784-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS2

The NM_000368.5(TSC1):c.2075G>A(p.Arg692Gln) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000104 in 1,613,822 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R692P) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00012 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00010 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

TSC1
NM_000368.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.06

Publications

11 publications found

Variant links:

COSMIC-nc: COSV53773769

Genes affected

TSC1 (HGNC:12362): (TSC complex subunit 1) This gene is a tumor suppressor gene that encodes the growth inhibitory protein hamartin. The encoded protein interacts with and stabilizes the GTPase activating protein tuberin. This hamartin-tuberin complex negatively regulates mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling which is a major regulator of anabolic cell growth. This protein also functions as a co-chaperone for Hsp90 that inhibits its ATPase activity. This protein functions as a facilitator of Hsp90-mediated folding of kinase and non-kinase clients, including TSC2 and thereby preventing their ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. Mutations in this gene have been associated with tuberous sclerosis and lymphangioleiomyomatosis. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

TSC1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

tuberous sclerosis
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
tuberous sclerosis 1
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, PanelApp Australia, Genomics England PanelApp, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
lung lymphangioleiomyomatosis
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
tuberous sclerosis complex
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

TSC1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.07654682).

BP6

Variant 9-132903784-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-132903784-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 41694.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 18 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TSC1	NM_000368.5 link	c.2075G>A	p.Arg692Gln	missense_variant	Exon 17 of 23	ENST00000298552.9	NP_000359.1	Q92574-1Q86WV8X5D9D2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TSC1	ENST00000298552.9 link	c.2075G>A	p.Arg692Gln	missense_variant	Exon 17 of 23	1	NM_000368.5	ENSP00000298552.3		Q92574-1
TSC1	ENST00000490179.4 link	c.2075G>A	p.Arg692Gln	missense_variant	Exon 18 of 24	3		ENSP00000495533.2		A0A2R8Y6S8

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000118

AC:

AN:

152118

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000724

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000196

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00231

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000577

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000167

AC:

AN:

251192

AF XY:

0.000169

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000116

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00209

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.000815

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000881

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000163

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000103

AC:

150

AN:

1461704

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000113

AC XY:

AN XY:

727136

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000597

AC:

AN:

33476

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000894

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00195

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00159

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000232

AC:

AN:

86246

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53400

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5632

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000135

AC:

AN:

1112008

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000215

AC:

AN:

60382

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.492

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000118

AC:

AN:

152118

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000108

AC XY:

AN XY:

74308

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000724

AC:

AN:

41414

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000196

AC:

AN:

15274

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00231

AC:

AN:

3462

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.000577

AC:

AN:

5196

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4812

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10612

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000147

AC:

AN:

68034

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2086

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.594

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000179

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000181

ExAC

AF:

0.000189

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000866

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:11

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Tuberous sclerosis 1

Benign:5

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 01, 2024

Myriad Genetics, Inc.

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. Homozygosity has been confirmed in one or more individuals. As homozygosity for pathogenic variants in this gene is generally assumed to result in embryonic lethality, this variant is unlikely to be pathogenic. -

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Nov 07, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 10, 2020

Division of Genomic Medicine, Department of Advanced Medicine, Medical Research Institute, Kanazawa Medical University

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Jul 13, 2012

Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:research

- -

Jan 13, 2020

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 22703879) -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:2

Feb 09, 2021

Sema4, Sema4

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:curation

- -

Sep 29, 2018

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Lymphangiomyomatosis;C1846385:Isolated focal cortical dysplasia type II;C1854465:Tuberous sclerosis 1

Uncertain:1

May 23, 2017

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Tuberous sclerosis syndrome

Benign:1

Aug 10, 2022

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Isolated focal cortical dysplasia type II

Benign:1

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

TSC1-related disorder

Benign:1

Oct 12, 2020

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.12

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.057

BayesDel_noAF

Uncertain

0.080

CADD

Pathogenic

(source)

DANN

Pathogenic

1.0

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.49

T;.;T;.;.;T;.;T;.;.;.

Eigen

Pathogenic

0.69

Eigen_PC

Pathogenic

0.67

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.96

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.92

.;D;D;D;D;.;.;.;D;D;.

M_CAP

Uncertain

0.22

MetaRNN

Benign

0.077

T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Uncertain

0.58

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.5

M;.;M;.;.;M;.;M;.;.;.

PhyloP100

5.1

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.50

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.98

N;N;N;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.

REVEL

Uncertain

0.57

Sift

Benign

0.19

T;D;T;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.

Sift4G

Pathogenic

0.0

D;D;D;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.

Polyphen

1.0

D;.;D;.;.;D;.;D;.;.;.

Vest4

0.74

MVP

0.77

MPC

1.4

ClinPred

0.16

GERP RS

5.3

Varity_R

0.25

gMVP

0.46

Mutation Taster

=62/38

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over