9-132905601-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -15 ACMG points: 0P and 15B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2

The NM_000368.5(TSC1):c.1977G>A(p.Ala659Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000336 in 1,614,114 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. A659A) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00032 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00034 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

TSC1
NM_000368.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:17

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.16

Publications

4 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

TSC1 (HGNC:12362): (TSC complex subunit 1) This gene is a tumor suppressor gene that encodes the growth inhibitory protein hamartin. The encoded protein interacts with and stabilizes the GTPase activating protein tuberin. This hamartin-tuberin complex negatively regulates mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling which is a major regulator of anabolic cell growth. This protein also functions as a co-chaperone for Hsp90 that inhibits its ATPase activity. This protein functions as a facilitator of Hsp90-mediated folding of kinase and non-kinase clients, including TSC2 and thereby preventing their ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. Mutations in this gene have been associated with tuberous sclerosis and lymphangioleiomyomatosis. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

TSC1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

tuberous sclerosis
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
tuberous sclerosis 1
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, PanelApp Australia, Genomics England PanelApp, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
lung lymphangioleiomyomatosis
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
tuberous sclerosis complex
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

TSC1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -15 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.35).

BP6

Variant 9-132905601-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-132905601-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 137731.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.16 with no splicing effect.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 48 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TSC1	NM_000368.5 link	c.1977G>A	p.Ala659Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 15 of 23	ENST00000298552.9	NP_000359.1	Q92574-1Q86WV8X5D9D2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TSC1	ENST00000298552.9 link	c.1977G>A	p.Ala659Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 15 of 23	1	NM_000368.5	ENSP00000298552.3		Q92574-1
TSC1	ENST00000490179.4 link	c.1977G>A	p.Ala659Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 16 of 24	3		ENSP00000495533.2		A0A2R8Y6S8

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000315

AC:

AN:

152178

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000589

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00547

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000265

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000956

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000418

AC:

105

AN:

251116

AF XY:

0.000464

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000607

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00546

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000168

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00163

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000338

AC:

494

AN:

1461818

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000359

AC XY:

261

AN XY:

727214

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33478

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000671

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00517

AC:

135

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000116

AC:

AN:

86250

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53418

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00140

AC:

AN:

5708

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000232

AC:

258

AN:

1112012

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00103

AC:

AN:

60392

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.480

Heterozygous variant carriers

129

161

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000315

AC:

AN:

152296

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000269

AC XY:

AN XY:

74478

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41556

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000588

AC:

AN:

15300

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00547

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5186

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4826

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10612

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000265

AC:

AN:

68026

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000946

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.502

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000650

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000434

EpiCase

AF:

0.000491

EpiControl

AF:

0.000474

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:17

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:5

Apr 18, 2013

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Feb 16, 2025

Laboratory of Genetics, Children's Clinical University Hospital Latvia

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 14, 2022

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 25, 2017

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 23, 2018

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Tuberous sclerosis 1

Benign:4

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 10, 2025

Myriad Genetics, Inc.

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Nov 07, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:3

Mar 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

TSC1: BP4, BP7 -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:2

Nov 18, 2014

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Sep 15, 2020

Sema4, Sema4

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:curation

- -

Tuberous sclerosis syndrome

Benign:1

Oct 09, 2022

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Lymphangiomyomatosis;C1846385:Isolated focal cortical dysplasia type II;C1854465:Tuberous sclerosis 1

Benign:1

Jun 21, 2024

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Isolated focal cortical dysplasia type II

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.35

CADD

Benign

0.061

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.67

PhyloP100

-1.2

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Mutation Taster

=99/1

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over