9-132905877-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000368.5(TSC1):​c.1701G>A​(p.Ala567Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000325 in 1,612,272 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. A567A) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0015 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00021 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

TSC1
NM_000368.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:17

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.224

Publications

4 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TSC1 (HGNC:12362): (TSC complex subunit 1) This gene is a tumor suppressor gene that encodes the growth inhibitory protein hamartin. The encoded protein interacts with and stabilizes the GTPase activating protein tuberin. This hamartin-tuberin complex negatively regulates mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling which is a major regulator of anabolic cell growth. This protein also functions as a co-chaperone for Hsp90 that inhibits its ATPase activity. This protein functions as a facilitator of Hsp90-mediated folding of kinase and non-kinase clients, including TSC2 and thereby preventing their ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. Mutations in this gene have been associated with tuberous sclerosis and lymphangioleiomyomatosis. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]
TSC1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • tuberous sclerosis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • tuberous sclerosis 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, PanelApp Australia, Genomics England PanelApp, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • lung lymphangioleiomyomatosis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • tuberous sclerosis complex
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.6).
BP6
Variant 9-132905877-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-132905877-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 137730.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.224 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00147 (224/152318) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00488 (203/41560). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00433. There are 2 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 110 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 224 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TSC1NM_000368.5 linkc.1701G>A p.Ala567Ala synonymous_variant Exon 15 of 23 ENST00000298552.9 NP_000359.1 Q92574-1Q86WV8X5D9D2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TSC1ENST00000298552.9 linkc.1701G>A p.Ala567Ala synonymous_variant Exon 15 of 23 1 NM_000368.5 ENSP00000298552.3 Q92574-1
TSC1ENST00000490179.4 linkc.1701G>A p.Ala567Ala synonymous_variant Exon 16 of 24 3 ENSP00000495533.2 A0A2R8Y6S8

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00147
AC:
224
AN:
152200
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00490
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00105
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00191
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000466
AC:
117
AN:
250810
AF XY:
0.000288
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00560
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000521
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000529
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000327
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000205
AC:
300
AN:
1459954
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000172
AC XY:
125
AN XY:
725970
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00605
AC:
202
AN:
33370
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000605
AC:
27
AN:
44622
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26070
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000202
AC:
8
AN:
39672
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000116
AC:
1
AN:
86218
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53384
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000347
AC:
2
AN:
5756
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000297
AC:
33
AN:
1110548
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000448
AC:
27
AN:
60314
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.486
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
23
46
68
91
114
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00147
AC:
224
AN:
152318
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00148
AC XY:
110
AN XY:
74488
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00488
AC:
203
AN:
41560
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00105
AC:
16
AN:
15298
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5186
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000207
AC:
1
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10616
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
68034
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00189
AC:
4
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
11
23
34
46
57
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000570
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00172
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:17
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 15, 2021
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 30, 2017
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 01, 2013
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Nov 25, 2014
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Tuberous sclerosis 1 Benign:5
Apr 10, 2025
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -

Jan 31, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 07, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided Benign:3
Aug 22, 2018
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

TSC1: BP4, BP7 -

Aug 22, 2018
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Oct 20, 2020
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

- -

Dec 12, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Tuberous sclerosis syndrome Benign:1
Feb 05, 2024
All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Isolated focal cortical dysplasia type II Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.60
CADD
Benign
0.44
DANN
Benign
0.54
PhyloP100
-0.22
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs35478675; hg19: chr9-135781264; API