9-132921885-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP6BS2
The NM_000368.5(TSC1):c.597C>T(p.Phe199=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000805 in 1,614,152 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000020 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000068 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
TSC1
NM_000368.5 synonymous
NM_000368.5 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.410
Genes affected
TSC1 (HGNC:12362): (TSC complex subunit 1) This gene is a tumor suppressor gene that encodes the growth inhibitory protein hamartin. The encoded protein interacts with and stabilizes the GTPase activating protein tuberin. This hamartin-tuberin complex negatively regulates mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling which is a major regulator of anabolic cell growth. This protein also functions as a co-chaperone for Hsp90 that inhibits its ATPase activity. This protein functions as a facilitator of Hsp90-mediated folding of kinase and non-kinase clients, including TSC2 and thereby preventing their ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. Mutations in this gene have been associated with tuberous sclerosis and lymphangioleiomyomatosis. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.
BP6
Variant 9-132921885-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-132921885-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 416683.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1}.
BS2
High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 10 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSC1 | NM_000368.5 | c.597C>T | p.Phe199= | synonymous_variant | 7/23 | ENST00000298552.9 | NP_000359.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSC1 | ENST00000298552.9 | c.597C>T | p.Phe199= | synonymous_variant | 7/23 | 1 | NM_000368.5 | ENSP00000298552 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152160Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
3
AN:
152160
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000239 AC: 6AN: 251306Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000221 AC XY: 3AN XY: 135808
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
6
AN:
251306
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
135808
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000684 AC: 10AN: 1461874Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000963 AC XY: 7AN XY: 727242
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
10
AN:
1461874
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
7
AN XY:
727242
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152278Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74456
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
3
AN:
152278
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
74456
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Tuberous sclerosis 1 Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Aug 11, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Nov 07, 2021 | - - |
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 17, 2023 | In silico analysis suggests this variant may impact gene splicing. In the absence of RNA/functional studies, the actual effect of this sequence change is unknown.; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge - |
Tuberous sclerosis syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Apr 10, 2023 | - - |
Lymphangiomyomatosis;C1846385:Isolated focal cortical dysplasia type II;C1854465:Tuberous sclerosis 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Apr 15, 2022 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Feb 21, 2019 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
DS_AG_spliceai
Position offset: -27
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at