9-132925700-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points: 2P and 20B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000368.5(TSC1):​c.250G>A​(p.Ala84Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000342 in 1,614,178 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 17/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A84S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00037 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00034 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

TSC1
NM_000368.5 missense

Scores

1
17

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:16O:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.225

Publications

32 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TSC1 (HGNC:12362): (TSC complex subunit 1) This gene is a tumor suppressor gene that encodes the growth inhibitory protein hamartin. The encoded protein interacts with and stabilizes the GTPase activating protein tuberin. This hamartin-tuberin complex negatively regulates mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling which is a major regulator of anabolic cell growth. This protein also functions as a co-chaperone for Hsp90 that inhibits its ATPase activity. This protein functions as a facilitator of Hsp90-mediated folding of kinase and non-kinase clients, including TSC2 and thereby preventing their ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. Mutations in this gene have been associated with tuberous sclerosis and lymphangioleiomyomatosis. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]
TSC1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • tuberous sclerosis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • tuberous sclerosis 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, PanelApp Australia, Genomics England PanelApp, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • lung lymphangioleiomyomatosis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • tuberous sclerosis complex
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points.

PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 2 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 5 benign, 26 uncertain in NM_000368.5
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.006469995).
BP6
Variant 9-132925700-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-132925700-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 48972.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000374 (57/152292) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.00579 (30/5182). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00417. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 39 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 57 AD gene.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000368.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
TSC1
NM_000368.5
MANE Select
c.250G>Ap.Ala84Thr
missense
Exon 5 of 23NP_000359.1
TSC1
NM_001406592.1
c.250G>Ap.Ala84Thr
missense
Exon 5 of 23NP_001393521.1
TSC1
NM_001406593.1
c.250G>Ap.Ala84Thr
missense
Exon 5 of 23NP_001393522.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
TSC1
ENST00000298552.9
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.250G>Ap.Ala84Thr
missense
Exon 5 of 23ENSP00000298552.3
TSC1
ENST00000490179.4
TSL:3
c.250G>Ap.Ala84Thr
missense
Exon 6 of 24ENSP00000495533.2
TSC1
ENST00000403810.6
TSL:1
c.250G>Ap.Ala84Thr
missense
Exon 5 of 10ENSP00000386093.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000368
AC:
56
AN:
152174
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000655
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00605
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00558
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000717
AC:
180
AN:
250968
AF XY:
0.000730
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000867
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00626
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00408
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000106
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000327
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000339
AC:
495
AN:
1461886
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000340
AC XY:
247
AN XY:
727242
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000157
AC:
7
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00612
AC:
160
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00373
AC:
148
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000730
AC:
63
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53418
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00104
AC:
6
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000656
AC:
73
AN:
1112006
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000629
AC:
38
AN:
60396
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.480
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
30
60
90
120
150
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000374
AC:
57
AN:
152292
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000524
AC XY:
39
AN XY:
74450
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
41580
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000654
AC:
1
AN:
15290
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00605
AC:
21
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00579
AC:
30
AN:
5182
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000207
AC:
1
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10612
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000588
AC:
4
AN:
68018
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.488
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
4
7
11
14
18
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000697
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.000480
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000270
AC:
1
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000349
AC:
3
ExAC
AF:
0.000725
AC:
88
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000866
AC:
3
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:16Other:2
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5Other:1
Mar 19, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Apr 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Sep 19, 2013
ITMI
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:reference population

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 30, 2021
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: TSC1 c.250G>A (p.Ala84Thr) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00072 in 250968 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 29 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in TSC1 causing Tuberous Sclerosis Complex phenotype (2.5e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.250G>A in individuals affected with Tuberous Sclerosis Complex has been reported. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function (example, Hoogeveen-Westerveld_2011). These results showed no damaging effect of this variant on both the formation and activity of the TSC1-TSC2 complex in an experimental system using immunoblotting followed by infrared scanner based detection. Five clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign.

Oct 08, 2022
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

The frequency of this variant in the general population (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org) is higher than would generally be expected for pathogenic variants in this gene. Computational tools predict this amino acid change may be benign. This variant has been seen where an alternate explanation for disease was also identified.

Tuberous sclerosis 1 Benign:5
Feb 01, 2025
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Apr 07, 2025
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance.

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Nov 07, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided Benign:2
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Nov 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

TSC1: BP4, BS1

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Oct 05, 2018
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Jul 21, 2020
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

Tuberous sclerosis syndrome Benign:1Other:1
May 17, 2022
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Tuberous sclerosis database (TSC1)
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:curation

Isolated focal cortical dysplasia type II Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.067
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.44
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.40
CADD
Benign
14
DANN
Benign
0.91
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.44
T
Eigen
Benign
-1.2
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.2
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.13
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.67
T
M_CAP
Benign
0.033
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0065
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.70
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.1
L
PhyloP100
0.23
PrimateAI
Benign
0.28
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.26
N
REVEL
Benign
0.20
Sift
Benign
0.34
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.086
T
Polyphen
0.0020
B
Vest4
0.26
MVP
0.45
MPC
0.49
ClinPred
0.012
T
GERP RS
-0.86
Varity_R
0.021
gMVP
0.059
Mutation Taster
=98/2
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs118203357; hg19: chr9-135801087; COSMIC: COSV53775575; API