9-133515524-C-CTGGG
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points: 2P and 0B. PM2
The NM_001080483.3(MYMK):c.482_483insCCCA(p.Ala162ProfsTer12) variant causes a frameshift change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000274 in 1,461,556 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Genomes: not found (cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000027 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
MYMK
NM_001080483.3 frameshift
NM_001080483.3 frameshift
Scores
Not classified
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 7.40
Genes affected
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYMK | NM_001080483.3 | c.482_483insCCCA | p.Ala162ProfsTer12 | frameshift_variant | 4/5 | ENST00000339996.4 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYMK | ENST00000339996.4 | c.482_483insCCCA | p.Ala162ProfsTer12 | frameshift_variant | 4/5 | 2 | NM_001080483.3 | P1 | |
MYMK | ENST00000413714.1 | downstream_gene_variant | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000119 AC: 3AN: 251254Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000736 AC XY: 1AN XY: 135798
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
3
AN:
251254
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
135798
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000274 AC: 4AN: 1461556Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00000275 AC XY: 2AN XY: 727092
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
4
AN:
1461556
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
727092
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
32
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Congenital nonprogressive myopathy with Moebius and Robin sequences Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Broad Center for Mendelian Genomics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard | Nov 16, 2020 | The heterozygous p.Ala162ProfsTer12 variant in MYMK (also known as TMEM8C) was identified by our study in the compound heterozygous state, along with a likely pathogenic variant, in 1 individual with Carey-Fineman-Ziter syndrome (CFZS). The variant has not been previously reported in individuals with CFZS, but has been identified in 0.006% (2/34554) of Latino chromosomes by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP ID: rs1386322306). Although this variant has been seen in the general population in a heterozygous state, its frequency is low enough to be consistent with a recessive carrier frequency. This variant is predicted to cause a frameshift, which alters the protein’s amino acid sequence beginning at position 162 and leads to a premature termination codon 12 amino acids downstream. This termination codon occurs within the last exon and is more likely to escape nonsense mediated decay (NMD) and result in a truncated protein. While there is some evidence to suggest that loss of function of the MYMK gene is a disease mechanism in autosomal recessive CFZS, this association is not yet strongly established based on the criteria laid out in Tayoun, 2018 (PMID: 30192042). In summary, while there is some suspicion for a pathogenic role, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain. ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: PM2, PVS1_supporting (Richards 2015). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at