9-133657152-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_000787.4(DBH):c.1645C>T(p.Arg549Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0615 in 1,614,048 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3,557 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R549S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000787.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000787.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DBH | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1645C>T | p.Arg549Cys | missense | Exon 11 of 12 | ENSP00000376776.2 | P09172 | ||
| DBH-AS1 | TSL:1 | n.162G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 1 of 2 | |||||
| DBH | c.1645C>T | p.Arg549Cys | missense | Exon 11 of 12 | ENSP00000530998.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0475 AC: 7231AN: 152160Hom.: 239 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0461 AC: 11580AN: 251400 AF XY: 0.0460 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0629 AC: 92009AN: 1461770Hom.: 3318 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.0615 AC XY: 44710AN XY: 727184 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0475 AC: 7229AN: 152278Hom.: 239 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0466 AC XY: 3467AN XY: 74456 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at