9-136364315-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points: 2P and 0B. PM2
The NM_052813.5(CARD9):c.1598C>A(p.Thr533Asn) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000071 in 1,407,568 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T533I) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_052813.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- deep dermatophytosisInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- predisposition to invasive fungal disease due to CARD9 deficiencyInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_052813.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CARD9 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1598C>A | p.Thr533Asn | missense | Exon 13 of 13 | ENSP00000360797.5 | Q9H257-1 | ||
| ENSG00000289701 | n.*1226C>A | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 12 of 13 | ENSP00000512460.1 | |||||
| ENSG00000289701 | n.*1226C>A | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 12 of 13 | ENSP00000512460.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 34
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000596 AC: 1AN: 167728 AF XY: 0.0000112 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 7.10e-7 AC: 1AN: 1407568Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000144 AC XY: 1AN XY: 695448 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 34
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at