9-136372044-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_052813.5(CARD9):c.35G>A(p.Ser12Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.412 in 1,612,496 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 140,040 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_052813.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CARD9 | NM_052813.5 | c.35G>A | p.Ser12Asn | missense_variant | 2/13 | ENST00000371732.10 | NP_434700.2 | |
CARD9 | NM_052814.4 | c.35G>A | p.Ser12Asn | missense_variant | 2/13 | NP_434701.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CARD9 | ENST00000371732.10 | c.35G>A | p.Ser12Asn | missense_variant | 2/13 | 1 | NM_052813.5 | ENSP00000360797.5 | ||
ENSG00000289701 | ENST00000696169.1 | n.35G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/13 | ENSP00000512460.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.380 AC: 57732AN: 151970Hom.: 11398 Cov.: 34
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.406 AC: 101503AN: 249730Hom.: 21442 AF XY: 0.398 AC XY: 53936AN XY: 135474
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.416 AC: 607140AN: 1460408Hom.: 128624 Cov.: 83 AF XY: 0.412 AC XY: 299118AN XY: 726504
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.380 AC: 57801AN: 152088Hom.: 11416 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.378 AC XY: 28109AN XY: 74352
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Predisposition to invasive fungal disease due to CARD9 deficiency Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 14, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 29, 2016 | Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Unidad de Genómica Garrahan, Hospital de Pediatría Garrahan | Jan 24, 2024 | This variant is classified as Benign based on local population frequency. This variant was detected in 76% of patients studied by a panel of primary immunodeficiencies. Number of patients: 67. Only high quality variants are reported. - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at