9-136507952-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 0P and 11B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS1BS2

The NM_017617.5(NOTCH1):c.3510+3G>A variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00019 in 1,612,284 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000085 ( 0 hom., cov: 34)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00020 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

NOTCH1
NM_017617.5 splice_region, intron

Scores

Splicing: ADA: 0.1540

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:4B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.03

Variant links:

Genes affected

NOTCH1 (HGNC:7881): (notch receptor 1) This gene encodes a member of the NOTCH family of proteins. Members of this Type I transmembrane protein family share structural characteristics including an extracellular domain consisting of multiple epidermal growth factor-like (EGF) repeats, and an intracellular domain consisting of multiple different domain types. Notch signaling is an evolutionarily conserved intercellular signaling pathway that regulates interactions between physically adjacent cells through binding of Notch family receptors to their cognate ligands. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed in the trans-Golgi network to generate two polypeptide chains that heterodimerize to form the mature cell-surface receptor. This receptor plays a role in the development of numerous cell and tissue types. Mutations in this gene are associated with aortic valve disease, Adams-Oliver syndrome, T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2016]

NOTCH1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.28).

BP6

Variant 9-136507952-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-136507952-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 477915.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=4}. Variant chr9-136507952-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000201 (293/1460122) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000263 (292/1111922). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000238. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 137 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 13 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
NOTCH1	NM_017617.5 link	c.3510+3G>A		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 21 of 33	ENST00000651671.1	NP_060087.3	P46531
NOTCH1	XM_011518717.3 link	c.2787+3G>A		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 18 of 30		XP_011517019.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
NOTCH1	ENST00000651671.1 link	c.3510+3G>A		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 21 of 33		NM_017617.5	ENSP00000498587.1		P46531

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000854

AC:

AN:

152162

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000483

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000162

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000809

AC:

AN:

247092

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000891

AC XY:

AN XY:

134746

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000652

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000170

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000201

AC:

293

AN:

1460122

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000189

AC XY:

137

AN XY:

726410

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000263

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000166

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000854

AC:

AN:

152162

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000807

AC XY:

AN XY:

74328

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000483

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000162

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000115

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000982

EpiCase

AF:

0.000109

EpiControl

AF:

0.000237

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:4

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 27, 2020

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 15, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 01, 2018

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection

Uncertain:1

Aug 14, 2023

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

The c.3510+3G>A intronic variant results from a G to A substitution 3 nucleotides after coding exon 21 in the NOTCH1 gene. This nucleotide position is not well conserved in available vertebrate species. In silico splice site analysis predicts that this alteration will not have any significant effect on splicing. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -

Aortic valve disease 1;C4014970:Adams-Oliver syndrome 5

Uncertain:1

Oct 31, 2018

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Adams-Oliver syndrome 5

Uncertain:1

Aug 04, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This sequence change falls in intron 21 of the NOTCH1 gene. It does not directly change the encoded amino acid sequence of the NOTCH1 protein. It affects a nucleotide within the consensus splice site. The frequency data for this variant in the population databases is considered unreliable, as metrics indicate poor data quality at this position in the gnomAD database. This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with NOTCH1-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 477915). Variants that disrupt the consensus splice site are a relatively common cause of aberrant splicing (PMID: 17576681, 9536098). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of sequence changes on RNA splicing suggest that this variant is not likely to affect RNA splicing. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.28

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.95

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

dbscSNV1_ADA

Benign

0.15

dbscSNV1_RF

Benign

0.34

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over