9-136677143-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_006412.4(AGPAT2):c.317-7C>T variant causes a splice region, splice polypyrimidine tract, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00303 in 1,612,570 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 148 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006412.4 splice_region, splice_polypyrimidine_tract, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGPAT2 | NM_006412.4 | c.317-7C>T | splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000371696.7 | NP_006403.2 | |||
AGPAT2 | NM_001012727.2 | c.317-7C>T | splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | NP_001012745.1 | ||||
AGPAT2 | XM_047422636.1 | c.8-7C>T | splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | XP_047278592.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGPAT2 | ENST00000371696.7 | c.317-7C>T | splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | 1 | NM_006412.4 | ENSP00000360761 | P1 | |||
AGPAT2 | ENST00000371694.7 | c.317-7C>T | splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | 1 | ENSP00000360759 | |||||
AGPAT2 | ENST00000472820.1 | n.238C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 1/4 | 1 | |||||
AGPAT2 | ENST00000470861.1 | n.604C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/2 | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0162 AC: 2472AN: 152244Hom.: 71 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00411 AC: 1010AN: 245834Hom.: 28 AF XY: 0.00308 AC XY: 413AN XY: 134006
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00165 AC: 2407AN: 1460208Hom.: 77 Cov.: 37 AF XY: 0.00144 AC XY: 1045AN XY: 726380
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0162 AC: 2475AN: 152362Hom.: 71 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0156 AC XY: 1159AN XY: 74512
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | - | Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 05, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 28, 2024 | - - |
Congenital generalized lipodystrophy type 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at