9-137048960-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 0P and 2B. BP4_Moderate
The NM_203468.3(ENTPD2):c.1265G>C(p.Gly422Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000194 in 1,532,936 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. G422S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_203468.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_203468.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENTPD2 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1265G>C | p.Gly422Ala | missense | Exon 8 of 9 | ENSP00000347213.2 | Q9Y5L3-1 | ||
| ENTPD2 | TSL:1 | c.1196G>C | p.Gly399Ala | missense | Exon 8 of 9 | ENSP00000312494.5 | Q9Y5L3-2 | ||
| ENTPD2 | TSL:1 | n.654G>C | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 1 of 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000920 AC: 14AN: 152166Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000625 AC: 8AN: 127916 AF XY: 0.0000853 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000205 AC: 283AN: 1380770Hom.: 0 Cov.: 54 AF XY: 0.000214 AC XY: 146AN XY: 680972 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000920 AC: 14AN: 152166Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000538 AC XY: 4AN XY: 74326 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at