Menu
GeneBe

9-14737471-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1

The NM_001379081.2(FREM1):c.6465A>G(p.Gln2155=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000432 in 1,613,884 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00038 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00044 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

FREM1
NM_001379081.2 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0870
Variant links:
Genes affected
FREM1 (HGNC:23399): (FRAS1 related extracellular matrix 1) This gene encodes a basement membrane protein that may play a role in craniofacial and renal development. Mutations in this gene have been associated with bifid nose with or without anorectal and renal anomalies. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been described. PubMed ID 19940113 describes one such variant that initiates transcription within a distinct, internal exon; the resulting shorter isoform (named Toll-like/interleukin-1 receptor regulator, TILRR) is suggested to be a co-receptor of the interleukin 1 receptor family and may regulate receptor function and Toll-like receptor/interleukin 1 receptor signal transduction, contributing to the control of inflammatory response activation. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.56).
BP6
Variant 9-14737471-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-14737471-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 366100.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr9-14737471-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.087 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000438 (640/1461622) while in subpopulation MID AF= 0.00468 (27/5766). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0033. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 339 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 30. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
FREM1NM_001379081.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.6465A>G p.Gln2155= synonymous_variant 37/37 ENST00000380880.4

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
FREM1ENST00000380880.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.6465A>G p.Gln2155= synonymous_variant 37/375 NM_001379081.2 P1Q5H8C1-1
FREM1ENST00000380894.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.2073A>G p.Gln691= synonymous_variant 14/141 Q5H8C1-2
FREM1ENST00000380875.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.*1031A>G 3_prime_UTR_variant, NMD_transcript_variant 31/311
FREM1ENST00000427623.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.*646A>G 3_prime_UTR_variant, NMD_transcript_variant 11/115 Q5H8C1-4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000381
AC:
58
AN:
152144
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000483
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000458
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00260
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000544
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00144
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000458
AC:
114
AN:
248990
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000481
AC XY:
65
AN XY:
135094
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000464
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00259
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000464
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000505
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00132
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000438
AC:
640
AN:
1461622
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000466
AC XY:
339
AN XY:
727092
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000179
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000559
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00360
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000255
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000936
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000377
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000696
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000381
AC:
58
AN:
152262
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000363
AC XY:
27
AN XY:
74464
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000481
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000458
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00260
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000544
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00142
Alfa
AF:
0.000686
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000438
EpiCase
AF:
0.00142
EpiControl
AF:
0.000653

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeDec 21, 2023- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenApr 01, 2021- -
Oculotrichoanal syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.56
Cadd
Benign
0.99
Dann
Benign
0.57

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs368790874; hg19: chr9-14737469; API