9-15466830-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS2
The ENST00000380733.9(PSIP1):āc.1450G>Cā(p.Ala484Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00013 in 1,613,192 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000380733.9 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSIP1 | NM_033222.5 | c.1450G>C | p.Ala484Pro | missense_variant | 15/16 | ENST00000380733.9 | NP_150091.2 | |
PSIP1 | NM_001128217.3 | c.1450G>C | p.Ala484Pro | missense_variant | 15/16 | NP_001121689.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSIP1 | ENST00000380733.9 | c.1450G>C | p.Ala484Pro | missense_variant | 15/16 | 1 | NM_033222.5 | ENSP00000370109 | P1 | |
PSIP1 | ENST00000380738.8 | c.1450G>C | p.Ala484Pro | missense_variant | 15/16 | 1 | ENSP00000370114 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000762 AC: 116AN: 152180Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000180 AC: 45AN: 249816Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000141 AC XY: 19AN XY: 135084
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000609 AC: 89AN: 1460894Hom.: 1 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000537 AC XY: 39AN XY: 726754
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000794 AC: 121AN: 152298Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000792 AC XY: 59AN XY: 74470
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jun 21, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at