9-2116037-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_003070.5(SMARCA2):​c.3672G>A​(p.Glu1224Glu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.126 in 1,612,202 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 22,628 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.23 ( 7917 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.12 ( 14711 hom. )

Consequence

SMARCA2
NM_003070.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.191

Publications

15 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
SMARCA2 (HGNC:11098): (SWI/SNF related, matrix associated, actin dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily a, member 2) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the SWI/SNF family of proteins and is highly similar to the brahma protein of Drosophila. Members of this family have helicase and ATPase activities and are thought to regulate transcription of certain genes by altering the chromatin structure around those genes. The encoded protein is part of the large ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complex SNF/SWI, which is required for transcriptional activation of genes normally repressed by chromatin. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene, which contains a trinucleotide repeat (CAG) length polymorphism. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2014]
SMARCA2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • intellectual disability-sparse hair-brachydactyly syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, G2P, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.61).
BP6
Variant 9-2116037-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-2116037-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 126346.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.191 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.586 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
SMARCA2NM_003070.5 linkc.3672G>A p.Glu1224Glu synonymous_variant Exon 25 of 34 ENST00000349721.8 NP_003061.3 P51531-1Q8N9Q1Q56A76
SMARCA2NM_001289396.2 linkc.3672G>A p.Glu1224Glu synonymous_variant Exon 25 of 34 NP_001276325.1 P51531-1Q8N9Q1B4DSC8
SMARCA2NM_139045.4 linkc.3672G>A p.Glu1224Glu synonymous_variant Exon 25 of 33 NP_620614.2 P51531-2Q8N9Q1Q56A76
SMARCA2NM_001289397.2 linkc.3498G>A p.Glu1166Glu synonymous_variant Exon 25 of 33 NP_001276326.1 P51531F6VDE0

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SMARCA2ENST00000349721.8 linkc.3672G>A p.Glu1224Glu synonymous_variant Exon 25 of 34 5 NM_003070.5 ENSP00000265773.5 P51531-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.234
AC:
35534
AN:
151964
Hom.:
7872
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.592
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0932
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.113
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0798
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0194
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0926
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0873
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.158
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.105
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.179
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.123
AC:
30639
AN:
249844
AF XY:
0.115
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.606
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0649
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0919
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0156
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0898
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.105
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.109
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.115
AC:
168002
AN:
1460120
Hom.:
14711
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.113
AC XY:
81859
AN XY:
726386
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.617
AC:
20602
AN:
33414
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0715
AC:
3195
AN:
44696
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0883
AC:
2306
AN:
26124
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0300
AC:
1190
AN:
39682
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0973
AC:
8383
AN:
86172
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0916
AC:
4889
AN:
53356
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.140
AC:
806
AN:
5764
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.107
AC:
118607
AN:
1110570
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.133
AC:
8024
AN:
60342
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.480
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
6826
13653
20479
27306
34132
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
4556
9112
13668
18224
22780
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.234
AC:
35634
AN:
152082
Hom.:
7917
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.227
AC XY:
16874
AN XY:
74362
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.593
AC:
24548
AN:
41430
American (AMR)
AF:
0.112
AC:
1717
AN:
15290
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0798
AC:
277
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0195
AC:
101
AN:
5186
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0931
AC:
448
AN:
4814
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0873
AC:
925
AN:
10598
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.160
AC:
47
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.105
AC:
7113
AN:
67978
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.177
AC:
373
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1022
2043
3065
4086
5108
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
314
628
942
1256
1570
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.151
Hom.:
4177
Bravo
AF:
0.253
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0950
AC:
330
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.108
EpiControl
AF:
0.106

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Jul 31, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:1
-
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Mar 13, 2016
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Nicolaides-Baraitser syndrome Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.61
CADD
Benign
0.74
DANN
Benign
0.41
PhyloP100
-0.19
Mutation Taster
=89/11
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs6601; hg19: chr9-2116037; COSMIC: COSV61807520; API