Menu
GeneBe

9-21970986-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 2P and 7B. PM1BP4_ModerateBP6BS2

The NM_000077.5(CDKN2A):ā€‹c.373G>Cā€‹(p.Asp125His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000353 in 1,610,420 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. D125E) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.00018 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.00037 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CDKN2A
NM_000077.5 missense

Scores

4
14

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:11B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.313
Variant links:
Genes affected
CDKN2A (HGNC:1787): (cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 2A) This gene generates several transcript variants which differ in their first exons. At least three alternatively spliced variants encoding distinct proteins have been reported, two of which encode structurally related isoforms known to function as inhibitors of CDK4 kinase. The remaining transcript includes an alternate first exon located 20 Kb upstream of the remainder of the gene; this transcript contains an alternate open reading frame (ARF) that specifies a protein which is structurally unrelated to the products of the other variants. This ARF product functions as a stabilizer of the tumor suppressor protein p53 as it can interact with, and sequester, the E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase MDM2, a protein responsible for the degradation of p53. In spite of the structural and functional differences, the CDK inhibitor isoforms and the ARF product encoded by this gene, through the regulatory roles of CDK4 and p53 in cell cycle G1 progression, share a common functionality in cell cycle G1 control. This gene is frequently mutated or deleted in a wide variety of tumors, and is known to be an important tumor suppressor gene. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2012]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.

PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 3 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 5 benign, 17 uncertain in NM_000077.5
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.15414613).
BP6
Variant 9-21970986-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-21970986-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 41577.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=10, Likely_benign=2}.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 28 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
CDKN2ANM_000077.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.373G>C p.Asp125His missense_variant 2/3 ENST00000304494.10
CDKN2ANM_058195.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.*17G>C 3_prime_UTR_variant 2/3 ENST00000579755.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
CDKN2AENST00000304494.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.373G>C p.Asp125His missense_variant 2/31 NM_000077.5 P2P42771-1
CDKN2AENST00000579755.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.*17G>C 3_prime_UTR_variant 2/31 NM_058195.4 Q8N726-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000184
AC:
28
AN:
152250
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000121
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000338
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000984
AC:
24
AN:
243848
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000105
AC XY:
14
AN XY:
132914
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000127
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000182
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000331
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000371
AC:
541
AN:
1458052
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000371
AC XY:
269
AN XY:
725502
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000120
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000470
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000232
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000184
AC:
28
AN:
152368
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000161
AC XY:
12
AN XY:
74520
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000120
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000338
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000354
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000189
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000259
AC:
1
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000227
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000116
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.0000577
AC:
7
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:11Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:4
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxApr 20, 2023In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Observed in individuals with melanoma, pancreatic cancer, and other cancers (Holland et al., 1999; Bishop et al., 2002; Begg et al., 2005; Orlow et al., 2007; Capanu et al., 2008; Council et al., 2009; Cust et al., 2011; Xu et al., 2015; Hu et al., 2016); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 10398427, 16234564, 17218939, 16896043, 25780468, 21325014, 20707869, 21462282, 26104880, 12072543, 22703879, 23819521, 26483394, 28822769, 28135145, 15146471, 19320745, 25186627, 29641532, 18335566, 32191290, 35001868, 34369425) -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedresearchBiesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of HealthJul 13, 2012- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoOct 07, 2022The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.0002 (25/125522 chromosomes in European (Non-Finnish) subpopulation, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org), is higher than would generally be expected for pathogenic variants in this gene. In the published literature, the variant has been reported in multiple individuals with melanoma as well as in unaffected controls (PMIDs: 10398427 (1999), 16234564 (2005), 19320745 (2009), 21325014 (2011), 25780468 (2014), and 29641532 (2018)). Additionally, it has been reported in affected individuals with childhood leukemia (PMID:26104880 (2015)), breast cancer (PMID: 25186627 (2015)), pancreatic cancer (PMID: 26483394 (2016)), osteosarcoma (PMID: 32191290 (2020)), and colorectal cancer (PMIDs: 28135145 (2017) and 28944238 (2017)). Published functional studies have reported inconclusive results on the effect this variant on CDK2NA protein function (PMID: 35001868 (2022), 34369425 (2022)). Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded conflicting predictions that this variant is deleterious or benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesAug 18, 2017- -
Melanoma-pancreatic cancer syndrome Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingSt. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research HospitalOct 28, 2021The CDKN2A c.373G>C (p.Asp125His) missense change has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.020% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/9-21970985-C-G). Six of six in silico tools predict a benign effect of this variant on protein function (BP4), but to our knowledge these predictions have not been confirmed by functional assays. This variant has been reported in two families where at least two affected individuals in each family harbored the variant (PP1; PMID: 32989607), in an individual with a first-degree relative with melanoma (PS4_supporting; PMID: 12072543), as well as in three individuals with presumed sporadic melanoma (PMID: 17218939). In addition, it has been reported in one individual with pancreatic cancer (PMID: 26483394), three individuals with osteosarcoma (PMID: 32191290), two individuals with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (PMID: 26104880), and one individual with colorectal cancer (PMID: 28944238). It has also been reported in a total of three non-cancer control subjects (PMID: 27640074, 29641532). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as of uncertain significance based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied: PS4_supporting, PP1, BP4. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylAug 24, 2016- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.Apr 20, 2023This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 12, 2019This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Aug 25, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthAug 08, 2016- -
not specified Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpMar 20, 2024Variant summary: CDKN2A c.373G>C (p.Asp125His) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the Ankyrin repeat-containing domain (IPR020683) of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00035 in 1612370 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.00046 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database (v4.0.0). The observed variant frequency within Non-Finnish European control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 1.5 fold the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in CDKN2A causing Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma phenotype (0.0003), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Non-Finnish European origin. c.373G>C has been reported in the literature in multiple isolated reports of individuals affected with cutaneous/malignant/familial melanoma, colorectal cancer, breast cancer, childhood B-ALL, and among individuals in a study of patients enrolled in the Mayo Clinic Pancreatic Cancer patient registry (example, Begg_2005, Berwick_2006, Yurgelun_2017, Tung_2015, Xu_2015). One study examining the prevalence and predictors of germline CDKN2A mutations in melanoma cases from Australia, Spain and the UK reported this variant as "non-pathogenic" (Harland_2014). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function. These results showed no damaging effect of this variant (Kimura_2022, Li_2022). The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 21462282, 25780468, 25186627, 26483394, 16896043, 18335566, 17218939, 12072543, 16234564, 19320745, 15146471, 26104880, 28135145, 27756164, 27960642, 28765326, 9166859, 16818274, 18519632, 7718873, 29758216, 10398427, 35001868, 34369425). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 41577). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as VUS-possibly benign. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalJul 31, 2024- -
Familial melanoma Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 30, 2024The CDKN2A gene encodes two different proteins, p16INK4a and p14ARF, which are translated from alternative transcripts with different open reading frames. Both transcripts have been analyzed. We report either the variant with the higher classification or default to the CDKN2A (p16INK4a) variant. This report therefore includes the details for the CDKN2A (p16INK4a) variant. This sequence change replaces aspartic acid, which is acidic and polar, with histidine, which is basic and polar, at codon 125 of the CDKN2A (p16INK4a) protein (p.Asp125His). This variant is present in population databases (rs146179135, gnomAD 0.02%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with melanoma and/or pancreatic cancer (PMID: 10398427, 12072543, 17218939, 19320745, 25780468, 26483394). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 41577). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function output the following: SIFT: "Not Available"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Not Available". The histidine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.31
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.027
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.030
CADD
Benign
10
DANN
Benign
0.87
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.46
T;T;.;.;.;.;T;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.96
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.96
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.14
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.72
T;T;.;T;.;T;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.064
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.15
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.86
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.42
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.5
N;.;.;D;.;.;.;.
REVEL
Uncertain
0.37
Sift
Benign
0.050
D;.;.;T;.;.;.;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.13
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.0040
B;.;.;.;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.30
MVP
0.85
MPC
0.49
ClinPred
0.033
T
GERP RS
1.7
Varity_R
0.18
gMVP
0.68

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs146179135; hg19: chr9-21970985; API